2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.geobios.2005.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vertebrate fossils from the Adamantina Formation (Late Cretaceous), Prata paleontological district, Minas Gerais State, Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The first records of Aeolosaurus outside of Patagonia were published by Santucci and Bertini (2001, see also the abstracts of Bertini et al, 1999aBertini et al, ,b, 2000, based on material from the Bauru Group, southeastern Brazil. This, and other sparse records of the genus Lopes and Buchmann, 2008), were used as paleobiogeographic and biostratigraphic indicators (e.g., Santucci and Bertini, 2001;Candeiro, 2006Candeiro, , 2010Candeiro et al, 2006). In our view, the fragmentary and isolated nature of most studied materials and the still sparse knowledge of the diversity and phylogenetic relationships of Brazilian titanosaurs generate uncertainty in the taxonomy of the specimens with these characteristics.…”
Section: History Of the Genus Aeolosaurusmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first records of Aeolosaurus outside of Patagonia were published by Santucci and Bertini (2001, see also the abstracts of Bertini et al, 1999aBertini et al, ,b, 2000, based on material from the Bauru Group, southeastern Brazil. This, and other sparse records of the genus Lopes and Buchmann, 2008), were used as paleobiogeographic and biostratigraphic indicators (e.g., Santucci and Bertini, 2001;Candeiro, 2006Candeiro, , 2010Candeiro et al, 2006). In our view, the fragmentary and isolated nature of most studied materials and the still sparse knowledge of the diversity and phylogenetic relationships of Brazilian titanosaurs generate uncertainty in the taxonomy of the specimens with these characteristics.…”
Section: History Of the Genus Aeolosaurusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first five taxa come from the Bauru Group and the latter from the Sanfranciscana Basin. In addition to these valid species, there are taxa that have been shown to be nomina dubia, such as Antarctosaurus brasiliensis (Arid and Vizotto, 1971;Kellner and Campos, 2000;Upchurch et al, 2004), taxa whose validity remains to be demonstrated, such as the Brazilian records of the Patagonian genus Aeolosaurus (Bertini et al, 1999(Bertini et al, , 2000Santucci and Bertini, 2001;Candeiro et al, 2006;Candeiro, 2010), and many isolated, fragmentary bones and teeth attributed to titanosaurs (e.g., Huene, 1931;Kellner and Campos, 2000;Bertini et al, 2001;Santucci and Bertini, 2001;Almeida et al, 2004;Lopes and Buchmann, 2008;Santucci, 2008;Bittencourt and Langer, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fernandes and Coimbra (1996) considered the Adamantina Formation to be the oldest part of the Bauru Group with a Turonian-Santonian age. Candeiro et al (2006) Remarks-There is no doubt that the cranial material of Mariliasuchus amarali represents one of the best preserved remains of heterodont notosuchians (Carvalho and Bertini 1999, Vasconcellos and Carvalho 2005, Zaher et al 2006, Andrade and Bertini 2008b, c, Nobre et al 2008) with complex food processing. Several complete specimens are three-dimensionally preserved with complete dental series showing beautiful wear patterns.…”
Section: Systematic Palaeontologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Brazil, a fragmentary lower jaw with a single premolar was found in the Adamantina Formation (Bertini et al 1993, Candeiro et al 2006), a stratigraphic unit that also included Mesungulatum [Pascual and Ortiz-Jaureguizar 2007]). These mammalian forms possess 4 to 6 mm large molars (Bonaparte 1996, Chornogubsky 2003, Gurovich 2005 which are comparable to those of the small-to medium-sized, specialized notosuchians.…”
Section: Possible Dietary Niche Partitioning and Overlap Between Notomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isolated teeth attributed to carcharodontosaurids (Silva & Kellner, 1999;Candeiro et al, 2004Candeiro et al, , 2006b) are currently considered to correspond to abelisaurids (Canale et al, 2009;Souza et al, 2011). However, most recently, new bone remains belonging to carcharodontosaurian theropods have been described (Azevedo et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%