“…Several strategies [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 ] have been investigated to reduce the shuttle effect, such as the use of modified separators [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 ], interlayers [ 13 , 14 , 15 ], solid-polymer electrolytes [ 16 ], or the addition of LiNO 3 in the electrolyte that passivates the lithium surface and mitigates the problems that take place in the anode. However, the use of porous carbonaceous materials in the positive electrode constitute an excellent matrix for the immobilization of sulfur and entrapment of polysulfides, such as carbon nanotubes [ 17 ], carbon nanofibers [ 18 , 19 , 20 ], carbon flowers [ 21 ], graphene [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 ], graphene doped with heteroatoms [ 27 , 28 ], graphene oxide [ 29 ], ordered mesoporous carbons [ 30 , 31 , 32 ], and metal oxide–carbon composites [ 33 ]. Unfortunately, most synthetic procedures for these materials are complex and require expensive and non-renewable raw materials, a drawback for large-scale applications.…”