2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2016.10.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Velocity model optimization for surface microseismic monitoring via amplitude stacking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Wavelet analysis has been demonstrated to be a useful means to address nonstationary signals, such as earthquakes and electromagnetic radiation [31,32]. However, the characteristic of wavelet nite length will cause the leakage of signals energy, and the analysis results are substantially in uenced by the choice of wavelet basis functions [33].…”
Section: Microseismic Signal Acquisition and Denoisingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Wavelet analysis has been demonstrated to be a useful means to address nonstationary signals, such as earthquakes and electromagnetic radiation [31,32]. However, the characteristic of wavelet nite length will cause the leakage of signals energy, and the analysis results are substantially in uenced by the choice of wavelet basis functions [33].…”
Section: Microseismic Signal Acquisition and Denoisingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on a study of the characteristics of mine microseismic signals, Vallejos and Mckinnon proposed a neural network model to classify the sources of microseismic events [20]. Jiang et al used velocity model optimization for surface microseismic monitoring via amplitude stacking to enhance the signal-to-noise ratio in the coal-bed gas reservoir in Western China [21]. To investigate the generation mechanism of microseismic signals, most scholars use numerical simulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this velocity model is particularly useful when the layer and tunnel are nearly perpendicular to one another, it is less effective when they form a certain angle or when the layer distribution is more complex, resulting in inconsistencies in sensor group velocity [ 19 ]. In addition, it is essentially still an SSH algorithm, and the introduction of more unknown parameters will lead to instability in the solution process and increase computational complexity [ 20 , 21 ]. In order to generate velocity models under different geological conditions, Ma et al [ 22 ] proposed four different equivalent velocity models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%