2014
DOI: 10.5194/esurf-2-167-2014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Velocity and concentration profiles of saline and turbidity currents flowing in a straight channel under quasi-uniform conditions

Abstract: Abstract. We present a series of detailed experimental observations of saline and turbidity currents flowing in a straight channel. Experiments are performed by continuously feeding the channel with a dense mixture until a quasi-steady configuration is obtained. The flume, 12 m long, is characterized by a concrete fixed bed with a uniform slope of 0.005. Longitudinal velocity profiles are measured in ten cross sections, 1 m apart, employing an ultrasound Doppler velocity profiler. We also measure the density o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Variations are to be expected with differences in basal materials, laboratory conditions and the difficulty in defining a current's height. A dependence of h max on both the flow's Richardson number (Sequeiros et al, ) and Reynolds number (Stagnaro & Pittaluga, ) has also been observed. For the partially confined flows analyzed here, h max remains nearly constant for all the laboratory‐scale flows at a height equal to half the channel depth, regardless of flow height or Richardson number.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Variations are to be expected with differences in basal materials, laboratory conditions and the difficulty in defining a current's height. A dependence of h max on both the flow's Richardson number (Sequeiros et al, ) and Reynolds number (Stagnaro & Pittaluga, ) has also been observed. For the partially confined flows analyzed here, h max remains nearly constant for all the laboratory‐scale flows at a height equal to half the channel depth, regardless of flow height or Richardson number.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…However, this approach has limitations for erosional or bypassing flows as it does not take into account Reynolds‐dependent turbulent effects in the lower boundary (Imran et al, ). Also, high‐velocity maximum heights were not replicated in the simulations of Kneller et al (), despite the stably stratified layer, nor in further experiments of subcritical flows which found limited dependence on Richardson number (Stagnaro & Pittaluga, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Stagnaro and Pittaluga [58] validated the empirical relation suggested by [56] using their experimental values of the entrainment coefficient and found that it provides a good estimate.…”
Section: Water Entrainment Into Turbidity Currentmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Lock-exchange generated turbidity currents have discontinuous flow properties; hence velocity measurements must be collected instantaneously to obtain a discrete, representative velocity profile. UVP is therefore gaining popularity as a method for measuring lock-exchange turbidity currents due to its ability to measure multiple velocity profiles [8,[26][27][28]. However, it remains under-utilized for experimental studies incorporating obstacles and substrates.…”
Section: Effect Of Confinement and Obstacles On Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%