1978
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(78)90694-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Varicose Veins: A Comparison of Surgery and Injection/Compression Sclerotherapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
21
0
1

Year Published

1984
1984
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is due to a lack of uniformity for diagnosis, definition of patient inclusion criteria and treatment “failure,” outcome measurement, etc. Such comparisons have been admirably attempted in the past by Lujan et al 14 and others 15–19 . More recently, Einarsson et al 20 found surgery was superior to sclerotherapy; however, this conclusion must not be extrapolated to encompass more modern UGS methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is due to a lack of uniformity for diagnosis, definition of patient inclusion criteria and treatment “failure,” outcome measurement, etc. Such comparisons have been admirably attempted in the past by Lujan et al 14 and others 15–19 . More recently, Einarsson et al 20 found surgery was superior to sclerotherapy; however, this conclusion must not be extrapolated to encompass more modern UGS methods.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgery carries a significantly high rate of thromboembolism, nerve injury, and wound infection, plus small risks of general anesthesia 10–24 . Surgery is no more effective than foam ultrasound‐guided sclerotherapy for primary truncal saphenous vein treatment and less so for recurrent varicose veins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when the three studies with Յ2 years follow-up were excluded, the decreased risk of recurrence with surgery became statistically significant (RR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.22-0.93; I 2 ϭ 93%). Moreover, when older studies (Ͻ1980) were excluded in sensitivity analysis, 26,31,33,41 the results remained statistically significant (RR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.16-0.90; I 2 ϭ 94%). No significant associations were found with other outcomes such as the risk of PE in four studies (RR 0.30; 95% CI, 0.06-1.46; I 2 ϭ 0%) and the proportion of patients satisfied (86% vs 82%; P ϭ .71); however, the small number of events makes these estimates imprecise.…”
Section: Sclerotherapy Studiesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…56 In addition, patients in these studies preferred sclerotherapy, 33 which gave better initial results 26 and was less likely to require additional treatment. 31 However, studies with longer follow-up periods suggested that the initial benefits of sclerotherapy declined over time. For instance, Hobbs et al 41 found that surgery seemed more effective than sclerotherapy after 6 years and when the condition involved the saphenous system and there was proximal incompetence.…”
Section: Sclerotherapy Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%