2019
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5827
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variation in community structure of gall‐inducing insects associated with a tropical plant supports the hypothesis of competition in stressful habitats

Abstract: Environmental factors act as drivers of species coexistence or competition. Mesic environments favor the action of parasites and predators on gall communities, while the factors that determine the structure of gall communities in xeric environments remain unknown. We evaluated the structure of gall communities along an environmental gradient defined by intrinsic plant characteristics, soil fertility, and aridity, and investigated the role of competition as a structuring force of gall communities in xeric envir… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
(156 reference statements)
1
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to the expected the galling species richness was not affected by plant species richness and abundance of super host plants, despite the tendency of a positive effect of the abundance of Copaifera oblongifolia on the arthropod gall richness. A possible explanation for these results may be environmental factors, such as environmental stress and soil fertility, which were not measured in the present study, but may also influence the distribution of galling species (Gonçalves-Alvim & Fernandes, 2001;Ramos et al, 2019). On the other hand, we found that galling species per plant species was negatively affected by plant species richness and positively affected by abundance of super-host plants, corroborating our expectations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Contrary to the expected the galling species richness was not affected by plant species richness and abundance of super host plants, despite the tendency of a positive effect of the abundance of Copaifera oblongifolia on the arthropod gall richness. A possible explanation for these results may be environmental factors, such as environmental stress and soil fertility, which were not measured in the present study, but may also influence the distribution of galling species (Gonçalves-Alvim & Fernandes, 2001;Ramos et al, 2019). On the other hand, we found that galling species per plant species was negatively affected by plant species richness and positively affected by abundance of super-host plants, corroborating our expectations.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Although we have suggested that variation in the availability of oviposition sites may be the generating mechanism of these results, other aspects of the host plant (e.g. tissue nutritional status) and microenvironmental variations should also be considered in future studies as possible variables that may affect the interspecific interactions between herbivores insects (see also Ramos et al 2019).…”
Section: Ecological Patternsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Several studies show that ecological interactions that occur between and within trophic levels can shape the structure of gall-inducing insect communities associated with a host plant (Fagundes et al 2005;Costa et al 2016;Ramos et al 2019). Larger plants can be more easily located, provide more oviposition sites for females and shelter from natural enemies (Lawton 1983;Jeffries and Lawton 1984;Araújo et al 2006).…”
Section: Ecological Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many species of gall-inducing insects can affect or be affected by exploitative competition with conspecifics, other gall-inducing insect species, and leaf chewers because they co-occur in space and time on the same host plant using the same resources (Pascual-Alvarado et al, 2008;Cornelissen et al, 2013;Fagundes et al, 2018;Ramos et al, 2019). In addition, gall-inducing insects have the ability to both manipulate and redirect plant growth and development of tissues (Cuevas-Reyes et al, 2004a,b) and modify chemical nutritional quality of their host plants (Pascual-Alvarado et al, 2008;Marini-Filho & Fernandes, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%