2010
DOI: 10.22490/21456453.893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variación somaclonal y selección in vitro con toxinas como herramienta en la búsqueda de resistencia a enfermedades en plantas: Revisión

Abstract: RIAA 1 (1) 2010: 7-15 7Variación somaclonal y selección in vitro con toxinas como herramienta en la búsqueda de resistencia a enfermedades en plantas: RevisiónResumen.-La diversidad alélica es un requisito fundamental para el éxito de los programas de fitomejoramiento. En casos en los que la reserva de genes es escasa existen varios mecanismos para aumentarla artificialmente, incluyendo la obtención de variantes somaclonales a través de técnicas de cultivo de tejidos vegetales in vitro. La variación somacl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These include supplementing culture media with growth retardants, osmotic inhibitors or tissue dehydrators, and using lower temperatures or lower light conditions (Engelmann 1997;Daniells et al 2001;Buitink et al 2002;Engelmann 2004;Benson 2008;Reed 2008). However, this conservation strategy has been questioned, as it can lead to long-term genetic instability (Roca et al 1991;Patiño Torres 2010) and morphogenetic abnormalities (Adams et al 1999;Dumet & Benson 2000). In Musa, these problems have been overcome by cryopreserving apical meristems, a process that is generally performed by incorporating the tissue in the cryogenic process under conditions of dehydrating and cooling (Esterbauer et al 1988;Panis & Swennen 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include supplementing culture media with growth retardants, osmotic inhibitors or tissue dehydrators, and using lower temperatures or lower light conditions (Engelmann 1997;Daniells et al 2001;Buitink et al 2002;Engelmann 2004;Benson 2008;Reed 2008). However, this conservation strategy has been questioned, as it can lead to long-term genetic instability (Roca et al 1991;Patiño Torres 2010) and morphogenetic abnormalities (Adams et al 1999;Dumet & Benson 2000). In Musa, these problems have been overcome by cryopreserving apical meristems, a process that is generally performed by incorporating the tissue in the cryogenic process under conditions of dehydrating and cooling (Esterbauer et al 1988;Panis & Swennen 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%