2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecss.2013.11.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Variability in a fjord-like coastal estuary I: Quantifying the circulation using a formal multi-tracer inverse approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to estimate O 2int , we require a conversion factor relating depth‐integrated values to ferry measurements: O2int=050normalmO2false(zfalse)normaldz=050normalmfalse(normalΔO2false(zfalse)+normalΦfalse)normaldz=γ50normalΔO2false(21emnormalmfalse)+50·normalΦ, where Φ = O 2 (50 m) represents the background concentration of O 2 which upwells into surface waters as part of the estuarine circulation in this region, and γ 50 is a scale depth to relate the measured anomaly Δ O 2 (2 m) from this background value with a depth integrated value on short time scales. The integration depth of 50 m is chosen because it encompasses the euphotic zone, which, if using the usual heuristic of “1% Photosynthetically Active Radiation level,” is typically between 10 and 30 m deep (Figure b), but is still shallow enough to be unaffected by advective effects in deeper water (Pawlowicz et al, ; Riche & Pawlowicz, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In order to estimate O 2int , we require a conversion factor relating depth‐integrated values to ferry measurements: O2int=050normalmO2false(zfalse)normaldz=050normalmfalse(normalΔO2false(zfalse)+normalΦfalse)normaldz=γ50normalΔO2false(21emnormalmfalse)+50·normalΦ, where Φ = O 2 (50 m) represents the background concentration of O 2 which upwells into surface waters as part of the estuarine circulation in this region, and γ 50 is a scale depth to relate the measured anomaly Δ O 2 (2 m) from this background value with a depth integrated value on short time scales. The integration depth of 50 m is chosen because it encompasses the euphotic zone, which, if using the usual heuristic of “1% Photosynthetically Active Radiation level,” is typically between 10 and 30 m deep (Figure b), but is still shallow enough to be unaffected by advective effects in deeper water (Pawlowicz et al, ; Riche & Pawlowicz, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…"1% Photosynthetically Active Radiation level," is typically between 10 and 30 m deep (Figure 3b), but is still shallow enough to be unaffected by advective effects in deeper water (Pawlowicz et al, 2007;Riche & Pawlowicz, 2014).…”
Section: Depth Variation Of Omentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Virtually none of the light that enters the SoG passes all the way through the surface estuarine outflow layer. The depth of separation between the outflowing and inflowing layers has been modelled at 50 m (Pawlowicz et al 2007) and 30 m (Riche and Pawlowicz 2014), and the depth of the Fraser River plume at 15 m (Johannessen et al 2006;Masson 2006). The more highly depth-resolved profiles shown here (Figs.…”
Section: Scalar Irradiance and The Average Cosinementioning
confidence: 85%
“…The Salish Sea estuarine circulation is driven by significant freshwater input, dominated by that of the Fraser River (Griffin and LeBlond 1990;Li et al 1999;Riche and Pawlowicz 2014). The IW is formed in the Haro Strait area by tidal mixing between outflowing surface water, with a large seasonal temperature cycle, and inflowing deeper Pacific water.…”
Section: A Regional Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these views of the circulation are often qualitative since speeds are not well known, and in certain cases a geostrophically controlled circulation could be directed along isopleths rather than across them. Quantitative tracer-based approaches include the ''box-model''-based Knudsen relations for estuarine flow (Hansen and Rattray 1965;MacCready et al 2018) or more complex variations thereof, applied locally by Pawlowicz (2001), Pawlowicz (2014), andMacCready et al (2021); or optimal water mass analyses (Tomczak 1981)-this latter approach was previously used along the thalweg of the Salish Sea as a whole by Masson (2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%