2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2004.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valuing watershed services: concepts and empirics from southeast Asia

Abstract: Few empirical studies have rigorously analyzed the downstream economic benefits of watershed protection to generate economic values of watershed services. By developing a conceptual framework and using household level economic and environmental data to illustrate its empirical tractability, this paper addresses the neglected, but critical, question of the importance of watershed services to farming communities in southeast Asia. A case study from Flores, Indonesia provides evidence of a substantive, quantified… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
0
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
54
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…More research is needed on the institutional and social conditions that might enable this kind of economic instruments to contribute to both a better environmental and economic performance of upstream landholders, as well as on the assumptions about the relationship between land use and the provision of environmental services on which PES schemes rely (Kaimowitz, 2005). The latter has proved to be a hard task, owing to the intrinsic complexity, context-specificity and scaledependent nature of the hydrological functions of land use (Gautam et al, 2004;Mungai et al, 2004;Pattanayak, 2004;Tomich et al, 2004;Costa, 2005;Scott et al,2005).…”
Section: Discussion and Insights For Pes Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More research is needed on the institutional and social conditions that might enable this kind of economic instruments to contribute to both a better environmental and economic performance of upstream landholders, as well as on the assumptions about the relationship between land use and the provision of environmental services on which PES schemes rely (Kaimowitz, 2005). The latter has proved to be a hard task, owing to the intrinsic complexity, context-specificity and scaledependent nature of the hydrological functions of land use (Gautam et al, 2004;Mungai et al, 2004;Pattanayak, 2004;Tomich et al, 2004;Costa, 2005;Scott et al,2005).…”
Section: Discussion and Insights For Pes Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Spatial trade-offs could be simply recognized as benefits here while cost there (Ring et al, 2010), it occurs spatially between different landscapes, ecosystems, communities and even countries. For example, the improvement in water productivity with more agricultural inputs in the upstream will consequentially impact the water quality regulation services and incur costs in the downstream (Pattanayak, 2004). Such trade-offs have been illustrated specifically in the agricultural production in the USA, where the highly intensive agriculture relied greatly on artificial fertilization and finally led to massive negative impacts on the fisheries in the Gulf of Mexico (Tilman et al, 2002;Cumming, 2005).…”
Section: Trade-offs Of Ecosystem Services At Different Scalesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para Pattanayak (2004), os serviços ambientais oferecidos por bacias hidrográficas podem ser mensurados por alterações positivas nas medidas de escoamento de superficial, vazão de cursos de água, erosão de solo e produção de sedimentos. Pagiola (2005) relata que PSA consiste na venda de serviços prestados pelas florestas (individualmente ou em conjunto).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified