2017
DOI: 10.18174/420536
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Valuation of livestock eco-agri-food systems: poultry, beef and dairy

Abstract: TEEB asked for the assessment of the impact of global livestock production systems on human systems and ecosystems. Poultry, beef and dairy production system have been analysed. The analysis shows that in many cases the negative externalities of livestock production are higher than the consumer price paid for the products.TEEB heeft gevraagd naar een analyse van het effect van veehouderijsystemen in verschillende delen van de wereld op de maatschappij en ecologische systemen. Voor pluimvee, rundveehouderij en … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A speculative interpretation of the scenario results for expansion in the meat and dairy sector with a higher input from skilled labour and capital is that "footloose" livestock production systems may thrive in the vicinity of urban centres. These are capital-intensive production systems, aimed at maximum technical efficiency, yet with possible trade-offs in terms of benefits to ecological and human livelihood systems [52]. While these systems may provide clear benefits in terms of an effective and efficient food provision, if these systems depend on global imports of feed or intermediate products (frozen meat, milk powder), the general equilibrium effects on food security and diet quality at population level may be less beneficial for society than under an alternative scenario that promotes a more diverse domestic supply.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A speculative interpretation of the scenario results for expansion in the meat and dairy sector with a higher input from skilled labour and capital is that "footloose" livestock production systems may thrive in the vicinity of urban centres. These are capital-intensive production systems, aimed at maximum technical efficiency, yet with possible trade-offs in terms of benefits to ecological and human livelihood systems [52]. While these systems may provide clear benefits in terms of an effective and efficient food provision, if these systems depend on global imports of feed or intermediate products (frozen meat, milk powder), the general equilibrium effects on food security and diet quality at population level may be less beneficial for society than under an alternative scenario that promotes a more diverse domestic supply.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From these studies, it is clear, among others, that arable products may be underpriced but that livestock products are clearly underpriced [15]. Then there are costs that are often overlooked such as the effects of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and land-use change [16].…”
Section: Circular Action Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The indicators are referred to both: i) value attributes (monetary) measured with metric scales; ii) non-value attributes ascertained with non-metric scale, (i.e semantic Lickert scale). The non-value attributes, are commonly referred to the natural capital costs (NCC) whose exploitation generates negative externalities on the stock of ecosystem resources (Baltussen et al, 2017). The NCC are quantified indirectly with indicators, because the absence of market transactions makes these values randomly dependent on subjective evaluations (de Groot et al, 2002).…”
Section: The Sustainability Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%