“…The development and validity tests of MFQ are extensively described in a key study by Graham et al (2011), in which the five moral foundations structure is proposed as a reliable, valid, and easy-to-use measurement tool for exploring the moral domain (p. 382) To advance future validation studies in other populations, MFQ has been translated into a wide range of languages (available at MoralFoundations.org) and utilized to test MFT's fivefoundational propositions in other cultures and countries. Support for a five-factor structure is found in three Chinese ethnic groups (Du, 2019), Brasil (Moreira, de Souza & Guerra, 2019), New Zealand (Davies, Sibley & Liu, 2014), Sweden (Nilsson & Erlandsson, 2015); Turkey (Yalçindag et al, 2019;Yilmaz et al, 2016), although it is acknowledged that five-factor models provide poor fit to the data (Davis, Rice, Van Tongeren et al, 2016;Zakharin & Bates, 2021). In addition, there is some evidence that the five-factor model proposed by MFT is not generalizable and, as a result, may not be meaningfully compared across populations.…”