2019
DOI: 10.1590/0102.3772e35513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity evidence of a Brazilian version of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire

Abstract: Morality is a human phenomenon that involves sensitivity and skills developed by the individual throughout their social life. Considering the importance of measuring the moral concerns of adults, this paper sought validity evidence for a Brazilian version of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire. Two studies were conducted, using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In the first study, 341 adults (63% women) responded to the on-line questionnaire translated and adapted to Brazilian Portuguese. The resul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…), using a six-point scale (1 = Strongly Disagree; 6 = Strongly Agree). The questionnaire was validated in Brazil by Moreira et al (2019). In our study, the reliabilities (McDonald's omega, ω; Cronbach's alpha, α) of the individual moral foundations ranged from 0.63 (fairness) to 0.74 (sanctity) for McDonald's omega, and from 0.63 (fairness) to 0.73 (sanctity) for Cronbach's alpha.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…), using a six-point scale (1 = Strongly Disagree; 6 = Strongly Agree). The questionnaire was validated in Brazil by Moreira et al (2019). In our study, the reliabilities (McDonald's omega, ω; Cronbach's alpha, α) of the individual moral foundations ranged from 0.63 (fairness) to 0.74 (sanctity) for McDonald's omega, and from 0.63 (fairness) to 0.73 (sanctity) for Cronbach's alpha.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The development and validity tests of MFQ are extensively described in a key study by Graham et al (2011), in which the five moral foundations structure is proposed as a reliable, valid, and easy-to-use measurement tool for exploring the moral domain (p. 382) To advance future validation studies in other populations, MFQ has been translated into a wide range of languages (available at MoralFoundations.org) and utilized to test MFT's fivefoundational propositions in other cultures and countries. Support for a five-factor structure is found in three Chinese ethnic groups (Du, 2019), Brasil (Moreira, de Souza & Guerra, 2019), New Zealand (Davies, Sibley & Liu, 2014), Sweden (Nilsson & Erlandsson, 2015); Turkey (Yalçindag et al, 2019;Yilmaz et al, 2016), although it is acknowledged that five-factor models provide poor fit to the data (Davis, Rice, Van Tongeren et al, 2016;Zakharin & Bates, 2021). In addition, there is some evidence that the five-factor model proposed by MFT is not generalizable and, as a result, may not be meaningfully compared across populations.…”
Section: Previous Validation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MFQ has also been translated to multiple languages and shows a high degree of validity in cross-cultural assessments, including Brazil (Moreira, Souza, & Guerra, 2019), China (Du, 2019), and Muslim populations in Turkey (Yilmaz, Harma, Bahçekapili, & Cesur, 2016).…”
Section: Moral Foundations Questionnairementioning
confidence: 99%