2009
DOI: 10.1017/s136898000999125x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validity and reliability of an FFQ for use with adolescents in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam

Abstract: Objective: The present study evaluates the reliability and validity of an FFQ designed for use with adolescents in urban Vietnam. Design: A cohort study was conducted between December 2003 and June 2004. The FFQ was administered three times over a 6-month period (FFQ 1-3) and nutrient intakes were compared to those obtained from four 24 h recalls collected over the same period (24 h recalls 1-4) using crude, energy-adjusted and de-attenuated correlation coefficients. The level of agreement between the two meas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
61
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
61
2
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the score proposed by Serra-Majem et al (12) , the seventeen articles were ranked as follows: the study from Slater et al (26) was very good/excellent; twelve studies (1,(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)23,27,29,31) were good; two studies (22,24) were acceptable/reasonable; and two studies (20,30) were poor. The quality assessment of the three studies that used methods other than the FFQ (21,25,28) resulted in one study being poor (20) and in two studies being acceptable/ reasonable (25,28) .…”
Section: Results Of the Study Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…According to the score proposed by Serra-Majem et al (12) , the seventeen articles were ranked as follows: the study from Slater et al (26) was very good/excellent; twelve studies (1,(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)23,27,29,31) were good; two studies (22,24) were acceptable/reasonable; and two studies (20,30) were poor. The quality assessment of the three studies that used methods other than the FFQ (21,25,28) resulted in one study being poor (20) and in two studies being acceptable/ reasonable (25,28) .…”
Section: Results Of the Study Quality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority (n 17) (1,(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(22)(23)(24)26,27,(29)(30)(31) of them were identified as studies assessing the validation and reproducibility of FFQ against reference dietary instruments (Table 2), while the remaining three studies considered questionnaires other than FFQ analysed for their validity and reproducibility against different reference methods (21,25,28) ( Table 3). …”
Section: Original Articlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations