Validitas Isi Alat Ukur Penelitian Konsep Dan Panduan Penilaiannya

Ihsan, Helli

doi:10.17509/pedagogia.v13i2.3557

Cited by 24 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Percentages for each cognitive level of the problem are C4= 77.27%, C5=20.45%, and C6=2.27%. An instrument is said to be valid when the instrument elements of the assessment are relevant and represent the construction of a measuring instrument that is targeted for a specific purpose (Ihsan, 2016).…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

HOTS assessment in circulatory system learning: Validity, reliability, and item quality

Rahmi

Habibah

Zulyusri

et al. 2021

JPBI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Biology learning, based on the curriculum-2013, requires students to be skilled at analyzing, evaluating, and creating to achieve Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). Thus, HOTS assessment instrument is crucial to be made. This study aimed to produce HOTS assessment instrument focused on circulatory system materials for XI graders. This research was conducted by using Research and Development (R&D) method with 4-D model. The subjects of this study were: two biology lecturers from Faculty of Mathematics and Science of Universitas Negeri Padang, two biology teachers, and 33 XI graders of Public Senior High School 1 Nan Sabaris. The data were collected using questionnaires which were validated by experts and analyzed using ANATES 4.09. The validity results reached as high as 87.54% (very valid) in which the empirical validity value was 88%. Meanwhile, the instrument was stated as very reliable (0.78), has a moderate difficulty, good differentiating power, and excellent option quality. Thus, as the recommendation, this instrument can be used to foster students’ HOTS.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

HOTS assessment in circulatory system learning: Validity, reliability, and item quality

Rahmi

Habibah

Zulyusri

et al. 2021

JPBI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Validity can also be interpreted as the extent to which the test measures what it is intended to measure (Ihsan, 2015). The validity in this study is content validity.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 98%

A Pilot Study on Organizational Justice Scale for Student Organization: Result of Reliability and Validity

Noerama

Kurniawan

Na’imah

2021

pssh

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Organizational justice is an individual's fair perception of organizational decisions taken by its leaders. Researchers conducted a psychometric analysis to determine the validity and reliability of the organizational justice scale. The organizational justice scale is based on three dimensions: distributive justice, procedural justice, and interactional justice. The pilot study involved 36 students who were members of the Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, Indonesia. The validity test uses content validity, product-moment item selection while measuring reliability using Cronbach's alpha which is analyzed using SPSS version 25. The analysis results prove that 32 items are feasible and reliable with Cronbach's alpha value of 0.948. Thus, the organizational justice scale can be used for research on student organizations.

show abstract

“…Learning tool is said to be feasible to be used if it meets the criteria of content and construct validity, where content validity consists of needs that are developed, and the novelty of those developed in this case is an inquiry model integrated of character education in a learning tools. Good content validity must be used with a variety of methods, both qualitatively or quantitatively, with the aim of reducing variations in the potential for errors in making learning tools and increasing the likelihood of obtaining construct validity indices in further studies (Ihsan, 2015).…”

Section: Componentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Learning Tools with Inquiry Models Integrated of Character Education

Azmi

Jufri

Makhrus

2020

Jurnal. Kependidikan. Fisika

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to describe the characteristics and validity of learning tools with inquiry models integrated of character education that is used in learning at junior high school level. The intended learning tools include syllabus, lesson plans, teaching materials, student worksheets, and scientific creativity test instruments. This research is an evaluative descriptive study that describes the characteristics and evaluates the quality of the validity of learning tools. The learning tools validation process involves three validators who validate the learning tools on aspects of content validity and construct validity. The validation results show that the validator's assessment of the learning framework developed in the aspects of content validity and construct validity are categorized as very valid with an average range of scores of ˃85%, with a percentage of agreement ˃75%. The results of this study can be used as a foundation that the learning tools with inquiry models integrated of character education can be implemented in the field.

show abstract

Validitas Isi Alat Ukur Penelitian Konsep Dan Panduan Penilaiannya

Cited by 24 publications

References 1 publication

HOTS assessment in circulatory system learning: Validity, reliability, and item quality

HOTS assessment in circulatory system learning: Validity, reliability, and item quality

A Pilot Study on Organizational Justice Scale for Student Organization: Result of Reliability and Validity

Learning Tools with Inquiry Models Integrated of Character Education

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About