2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2008.03.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of virtual reality as a tool to understand and prevent child pedestrian injury

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
146
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(154 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
6
146
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, these data mirrored published accident statistics as well as developmental differences between younger and older adults, suggesting that the VR tool was valid to examine crossing skills and strategies. While some of our results supported a relatively good psychological validity of the VR situation, direct comparisons between VR simulations and road-crossing behavior in a natural environment are still needed (e.g., Schwebel et al, 2008).…”
Section: Decisionsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Finally, these data mirrored published accident statistics as well as developmental differences between younger and older adults, suggesting that the VR tool was valid to examine crossing skills and strategies. While some of our results supported a relatively good psychological validity of the VR situation, direct comparisons between VR simulations and road-crossing behavior in a natural environment are still needed (e.g., Schwebel et al, 2008).…”
Section: Decisionsmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…With regards to the pedestrian task, the effects of peers on other, potentially more risky, types of crossing decisions are needed, such as judging traffic gaps. The use of pedestrian simulation would be valuable in this respect (Schwebel et al 2008). Safety education often focuses on the individual and his or her behavior, but individuals are also peers and potential influencers of their friends' behaviors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifics of the hardware, software, and experience within the virtual environment are published elsewhere (Schwebel et al, 2008). Briefly, participants are semi-immersed into an environment displaying a 180 • perspective on three monitors arranged in a semi-circle in front of them.…”
Section: Virtual Reality Protocol and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%