2006
DOI: 10.1590/s1806-83242006000400006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of the Portuguese version of the RDC/TMD Axis II questionnaire

Abstract: . Para a coleta de dados foram utilizados os seguintes instrumentos: RDC/TMD Eixo I, para avaliação clínica e classificação da DTM, Eixo II, para avaliação psicossocial, e os questionários específicos para avaliação da qualidade de vida relacionada à saúde bucal: Impacto da Saúde Bucal nas Atividades Diárias e Perfil do Impacto na Saúde Bucal-14, considerados padrões-ouro. A validação consistiu na avaliação da consistência interna pelo teste de confiabilidade alfa Cronbach, confiabilidade e reprodutibilidade e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
73
1
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
73
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In a validation study of the portuguese version of RDC/TMD -Axis II, lucena et al 34 found α= 0.73 for jaw function limitation, which is considered an adequate value, although lower than what was found in the present study (α= 0.8971). For the original version of the questionnaire (in english), Dworkin et al 33 found α values of 0.91, 0.82, 0.78 and 0.71 for the domains of depression, non-specific physical symptoms (pain items included), non-specific 7 -em uma escala de 0 a 10, se você tivesse que dar uma nota para a sua dor na face, agora, neste exato momento, que nota você daria, sendo que 0 é "nenhuma dor" e 10 é a "pior dor possível"?…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a validation study of the portuguese version of RDC/TMD -Axis II, lucena et al 34 found α= 0.73 for jaw function limitation, which is considered an adequate value, although lower than what was found in the present study (α= 0.8971). For the original version of the questionnaire (in english), Dworkin et al 33 found α values of 0.91, 0.82, 0.78 and 0.71 for the domains of depression, non-specific physical symptoms (pain items included), non-specific 7 -em uma escala de 0 a 10, se você tivesse que dar uma nota para a sua dor na face, agora, neste exato momento, que nota você daria, sendo que 0 é "nenhuma dor" e 10 é a "pior dor possível"?…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 71%
“…however, when it comes to internal consistency 33 and intrarater reproducibility of the RDC/ TMD -Axis II, studies are scarcer, especially for an instrument in the portuguese language. 34 Consequently, this study is considered a very important contribution to researchers in the field of TMDs in terms of the reliability of a culturally-adapted assessment tool in Brazilian portuguese.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In adults, however, this distance should have the same proportion as the LC-CE for facial balance and so that the muscles may be caused by occlusal macro-traumas and micro-traumasthat affect chewing function and cause functional asymmetry of the stomatognathic system 9,25,26 . A number of studies have demonstrated that there is no standardized method for the detection of TMD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disorders (RDC/TMD) distinguish. It enables the standardized assessment of the dysfunction, the detection of multiple diagnoses for each TMJ as well as the diagnostic subtypes classification (6,7,8).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%