2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-94196-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of real-time RT-PCR for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in the early stages of the COVID-19 outbreak in the Republic of Korea

Abstract: A real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) assay that does not require Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) reagents was tested and validated for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) during the early stages of the outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the Republic of Korea. Early diagnosis of COVID-19 enables timely treatment and the implementation of public health measures. We validated the sensitivity, specificity, precision, linea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RT-PCR targeted the RdRp (ORF1ab) and N genes as per the protocol described by the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (China CDC) and recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) ( CDC, 2020 ; World Health Organization [WHO], 2020b ). This RT-PCR method has a sensitivity of 98.2% and specificity of 100% compared to different real-time RT-PCR assays ( Vogels et al, 2020 ; Chung et al, 2021 ). The patient did not require hospitalization, and after 7 days, his symptoms went away, though he experienced fatigue for two more weeks.…”
Section: Case Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RT-PCR targeted the RdRp (ORF1ab) and N genes as per the protocol described by the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention (China CDC) and recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) ( CDC, 2020 ; World Health Organization [WHO], 2020b ). This RT-PCR method has a sensitivity of 98.2% and specificity of 100% compared to different real-time RT-PCR assays ( Vogels et al, 2020 ; Chung et al, 2021 ). The patient did not require hospitalization, and after 7 days, his symptoms went away, though he experienced fatigue for two more weeks.…”
Section: Case Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the previous results, the cyclic threshold (C t ) values ​​of COVID-19 patients are mainly distributed in the range of 18.12–32.23 (mean of 27.16) ( Azzi et al, 2020 ). Considering the relationship between C t value and viral concentration (PFU/mL), the COVID-19 positive samples may include about 3000 PFU/mL of the virus ( Chung et al, 2021 ). Because the present method can detect SARS-CoV-2 at lower concentrations than 3000 PFU/mL, we think the method has the potential for the diagnosis of COVID-19 patients.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RT-PCR and isothermal nucleic acid amplification are two well-developed amplification methods diagnostic tools. RT-PCR tests, as one of the most used SARS-CoV-2 detection methods [ 86 , 87 ], will be further described in Section 2.3. Despite the wide adaptation of PCR, PCR machines are costly, and its thermal cycling process is time consuming.…”
Section: Wastewater Viral Detection Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%