1999
DOI: 10.1097/00005768-199905001-01406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of Aerosport Kb1-C Portable Metabolic System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
30
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The mean error of the equipment is relatively small (6%) and the Aerosport Kb1C is acceptable for measuring oxygen uptake in the range of 1.5 to 3.5 L/min, which was the interval used in the present study. The medium-flow pneumotach setting (flow-rate range of 10-120 L/min) was used to decrease the error in the volume measurement (21).…”
Section: Analytical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mean error of the equipment is relatively small (6%) and the Aerosport Kb1C is acceptable for measuring oxygen uptake in the range of 1.5 to 3.5 L/min, which was the interval used in the present study. The medium-flow pneumotach setting (flow-rate range of 10-120 L/min) was used to decrease the error in the volume measurement (21).…”
Section: Analytical Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…errors at rest and during exercise had a 95% LOA of -70 to 140 ml/min and -50 to 590 ml/min, respectively; and King et al 16) reported that the individual V ・ E and V ・ O2 errors for the Aerosport KB1-C (Aeroport, Michigan, USA) had a 95% LOA of approximately -500 to 450 ml/min between rest and 250 W. Metabolic measurement systems equipped with a ventilation meter have been reported in some studies to underestimate or overestimate ventilation. Ventilation meters with turbine and pneumotachometry expression are used in many systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The KB1-C has also been validated against a criterion Douglas bag system during cycle ergometry [13]. In this latter study, the validity of the system was acceptable for measuring O 2 uptake in the 1.5 to 3.5 L/min range [13].…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 90%