Validation of a second generation Type 3 generic wind model

Richwine, Matthew P.; Sanchez-Gasca, J.J.; Miller, N.W.

doi:10.1109/pesgm.2014.6939017

Cited by 6 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As mentioned above, the IEC WPP control model has the input for the active power limitation; and in this paper the measured active power is supplied as active power limitation setpoint to the WPP controller, similar to the approach used in [4] and proposed in [12]. Thus the active power fluctuations during the whole period could be simulated (Fig.…”

Section: B Comparison Of Simulation Results and Field Measurements Fmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In [11], validation results for the WECC [2] and vendor specific models are given based on field or factory test measurements both at WT and WPP level. Moreover in [11], a WPP model validation is conducted based on staged tests of a 70 MW WPP with setpoint changes and disturbances, same as the cases in [12] and [13]. Similarly, a voltage control setpoint change and staged disturbances for WPPs are utilized to validate the manufacturer specific and power system software specific models in [14] and [15].…”

Section: Wind Power Validation Studies State Of the Artmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The parameters of the model can be deduced from the physical parameters of the WT and the controllers [4]. But since generic models are based on simplifications, tuning parameters against available measurements [12], [15], [23], -e.g. by using optimization like the heuristic optimization algorithm in [4] -, can provide improved accuracy.…”

Section: Wind Power Validation Studies State Of the Artmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Field Validation of IEC 61400-27-1 Wind Generation Type 3 Model With Plant Power Factor Controller

Göksu

Altin

Fortmann

et al. 2016

IEEE Trans. Energy Convers.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

 Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.  You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain  You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

show abstract

Section: B Comparison Of Simulation Results and Field Measurements Fmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Wind Power Validation Studies State Of the Artmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Wind Power Validation Studies State Of the Artmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Field Validation of IEC 61400-27-1 Wind Generation Type 3 Model With Plant Power Factor Controller

Göksu

Altin

Fortmann

et al. 2016

IEEE Trans. Energy Convers.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For instance, works such as References [17,18], among others, conducted in-depth analyses addressing the dynamic behavior of the generic Type 3 WT model defined by Standard IEC 61400-27-1 when subjected to voltage dips, while also describing the main control models which are part of this WT. Regarding the WECC guidelines, works such as References [19][20][21] addressed the development process of the second generation WT models, while References [22] focused on the validation of a generic Type 3 WECC model against different grid events. Finally, references [23] addressed the validation of wind farm models according to the WECC guidelines.…”

Section: Wecc Second Generation Of Wind Turbine Models: Typementioning

confidence: 99%

Submission of a WECC DFIG Wind Turbine Model to Spanish Operation Procedure 12.3

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Power systems are currently witnessing a high wind-power penetration due to the development and commissioning of an increasing number of wind-power plants. This new scenario inevitably changes the way power systems are operated, mainly due to the uncertainties associated with wind, with the proper integration of this renewable energy source into the grid emerging as a new challenge. Unlike other highly flexible energy sources that can be used on demand according to the market needs, wind energy production is intermittent and non-dispatchable. In this context, transient stability analyses through the dynamic simulation of wind-turbine models and wind-power plants must be carried out. Moreover, as many countries have their own grid codes, the compliance requirements to connect wind farms to the network may be significantly different, depending on the specific region. In light of the above, this paper addresses the submission to Spanish Operation Procedure 12.3 (PO 12.3), for the first time, of one of the most advanced wind-turbine models, the generic Type 3 or doubly fed induction generator defined by the Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC) Second-Generation guidelines. The results show, on the one hand, the notable effect of the transformer inrush current, which influences the accuracy of the behavior of the generic wind-turbine model, and, on the other hand, the inability of the generic model to represent the transient periods of actual wind turbines. However, when the validation criteria is applied at the low-voltage measurement point, the WECC model fully complies with Spanish grid code PO 12.3.

show abstract

“…Furthermore, validation efforts have been conducted since the publication of IEC 61400-27-1 and WECC second generation models. In this sense, one of the first validation works corresponds to [30], in which a generic Type 3 WECC model is validated, considering first and second generations, as well as a manufacturer model. In [31], the IEC validation methodology is presented and implemented on both an IEC Type 3 generic model and a manufacturer model.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Generic Type 3 WT models: comparison between IEC and WECC approaches

Lorenzo-Bonache

Honrubia-Escribano

Fortmann

et al. 2019

IET Renewable Power Generation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The widespread use of renewable energies around the world has generated the need for new tools and resources to allow them to be properly integrated into current power systems. Power system operators need new dynamic generic models of wind turbines and wind farms adaptable to any vendor topology and which permit transient stability analysis of their networks with the required accuracy. Under this framework, the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) and the Western Electricity Coordinating Council (WECC) have developed their own generic dynamic models of wind turbines for stability analysis. Although these entities work in conjunction, the focus of each is slightly different. The WECC models attempt to minimise the complexity and number of parameters needed, while the IEC approach aims to optimise comparison with real turbine measurements. This study presents a detailed comparison between these two different approaches for modeling a Type 3 (i.e., DFIG) wind turbine in MATLAB/Simulink. Finally, several simulations are conducted, with which the consequences of the different approaches are evaluated. The results of this paper are of interest to power system operators as well as wind turbine manufacturers who require further assistance in adapting their specific models to the simplified versions provided by the International Committees.Nomenclature P control active power control Q control reactive power control Q limitation reactive current limitation IET Renew. Power Gener.

show abstract

Validation of a second generation Type 3 generic wind model

Cited by 6 publications

References 4 publications

Field Validation of IEC 61400-27-1 Wind Generation Type 3 Model With Plant Power Factor Controller

Field Validation of IEC 61400-27-1 Wind Generation Type 3 Model With Plant Power Factor Controller

Submission of a WECC DFIG Wind Turbine Model to Spanish Operation Procedure 12.3

Generic Type 3 WT models: comparison between IEC and WECC approaches

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About