2011
DOI: 10.1159/000331478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a Research Case Definition of Gulf War Illness in the 1991 US Military Population

Abstract: Background: A case definition of Gulf War illness with 3 primary variants, previously developed by factor analysis of symptoms in a US Navy construction battalion and validated in clinic veterans, identified ill veterans with objective abnormalities of brain function. This study tests prestated hypotheses of its external validity. Methods: A stratified probability sample (n = 8,020), selected from a sampling frame of the 3.5 million Gulf War era US military veterans, completed a computer-assisted telephone int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
58
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
3
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The survey objectives, sampling design, allocation and selection of the sample, questionnaire content, data collection and quality control methods, statistical power, methods for constructing sampling weights, and initial findings were published previously in Neuroepidemiology [15]. Briefly, the database of all personnel who were in the US Armed Forces as of August 2, 1990, maintained by the Defense Manpower Data Center (Seaside, Calif., USA), was stratified by age, sex, race, officer versus enlisted rank, military component (active duty vs. activated Reserve/National Guard or recalled retired), special military occupations (air flight crews, aircraft maintenance, army special forces, or other), deployment versus nondeployed to the Kuwaiti Theater of Operations during the conflict period, and in theater location on 20 January 1991.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The survey objectives, sampling design, allocation and selection of the sample, questionnaire content, data collection and quality control methods, statistical power, methods for constructing sampling weights, and initial findings were published previously in Neuroepidemiology [15]. Briefly, the database of all personnel who were in the US Armed Forces as of August 2, 1990, maintained by the Defense Manpower Data Center (Seaside, Calif., USA), was stratified by age, sex, race, officer versus enlisted rank, military component (active duty vs. activated Reserve/National Guard or recalled retired), special military occupations (air flight crews, aircraft maintenance, army special forces, or other), deployment versus nondeployed to the Kuwaiti Theater of Operations during the conflict period, and in theater location on 20 January 1991.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In total, 8,020 Gulf War-era veterans were enrolled and interviewed with questions measuring a broad array of symptoms, wartime exposures and family issues. A sampling weight was constructed for each participant combining a survey design weight (the inverse of the probability of selection into the sample), a nonlocation correction weight derived by a logistic regression analysis to correct for the sample members who could not be located, and a nonparticipation correction weight derived similarly to correct for those who were located but declined to participate [15]. Application of the sampling weights in computing the hypothesis tests removes any selection bias introduced by the unequal selection probabilities and minimizes selection bias from inability to locate or obtain participation from sample nonparticipants, allowing the analytic results to reflect the true population effects.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The study population consisted of 2095 veterans [mean age 46.5 years (range 34 -76); 16% women] selected as a representative sample of the 1991 US military population who participated in the US Military Health Survey (21,22 ). The population had relatively low rates of common conditions such as diabetes (10.3%), heart disease (7.7%), liver disease (2.2%), and obesity (body mass index Ͼ35) (10.5%).…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%