2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validation of a new grading system for endoscopic examination of adenoid hypertrophy

Abstract: This new validated grading system may be a useful standard for reporting adenoid size in future clinical outcome studies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
109
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 152 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
109
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The degree of obstruction by the adenoid tissue over the posterior choanae is estimated using the grading system proposed by Parikh: grade 1 for adenoid tissue not in contact with adjacent structures; grade 2 for adenoid tissue in contact with torus tubarius, grade 3 for adenoid tissue in contact with vomer, and grade 4 for adenoid tissue in contact with soft palate (at rest) [12]. However, other methods to perform a grading system of adenoid hypertrophy have been reported in literature [11,13]; among them the new method recently proposed by Josephon et aI., [13] and, in the future, we would like to implement it in our clinical practice.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The degree of obstruction by the adenoid tissue over the posterior choanae is estimated using the grading system proposed by Parikh: grade 1 for adenoid tissue not in contact with adjacent structures; grade 2 for adenoid tissue in contact with torus tubarius, grade 3 for adenoid tissue in contact with vomer, and grade 4 for adenoid tissue in contact with soft palate (at rest) [12]. However, other methods to perform a grading system of adenoid hypertrophy have been reported in literature [11,13]; among them the new method recently proposed by Josephon et aI., [13] and, in the future, we would like to implement it in our clinical practice.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnosis of AH was based on history and physical and endoscopic examination (15). AH was graded in accordance with Parikh's classification: grade 1 indicated adenoid tissue not in contact with the adjacent structures, grade 2 indicated adenoid tissue in contact with the torus tubarius, grade 3 indicated adenoid tissue in contact with the vomer, and grade 4 indicated adenoid tissue in contact with the soft palate (16). In our study, grades 3 or 4 were regarded as AH.…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The palatine tonsils and adenoid hypertrophy was classified into one to four grades based on the oroscopy and nasopharyngoscopy, respectively (14,15) . Other obstructive airway diseases were not observed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%