1995
DOI: 10.1300/j029v04n04_02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validating the Adolescent Form of the Substance Abuse Subtle Screening Inventory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Le processus suivi illustre à la fois l'histoire du développement des services en toxicomanie pour les jeunes au Québec et celui de la recherche en partenariat en toxicomanie depuis 1990. (Martino, Grilo & Fehon, 2000), le Problem Oriented Screening Instrument for Teenagers (POSIT) (Hall, Richardson, Spears & Rembert, 1998 ;Dembo, Schmeidler, Borden, Sue & Manning, 1997 ;Latimer, Winters & Stinchfield, 1997), le Substance Abuse Subtle Screening Inventory Adolescent Form (SASSI-A) (Bauman, Merta & Steiner, 1999 ;Risberg, Stevens & Graybill, 1995), le Drug Involvement Scale for Adolescents (DISA) (Eggert, Herting & Thompson, 1996), le Adolescent Drug Involvement Scale (ADIS) (Moberg et Hahn, 1991), le Drug Use Screnning Inventory (DUSI) (Tarter et Hegedus, 1991), le Personal Experience Screening Questionnaire (PESQ) (Winters, 1992) et le CRAFFT (Knight, Sherritt, Shrier, Harris & Chang, 2002).…”
Section: Contexteunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Le processus suivi illustre à la fois l'histoire du développement des services en toxicomanie pour les jeunes au Québec et celui de la recherche en partenariat en toxicomanie depuis 1990. (Martino, Grilo & Fehon, 2000), le Problem Oriented Screening Instrument for Teenagers (POSIT) (Hall, Richardson, Spears & Rembert, 1998 ;Dembo, Schmeidler, Borden, Sue & Manning, 1997 ;Latimer, Winters & Stinchfield, 1997), le Substance Abuse Subtle Screening Inventory Adolescent Form (SASSI-A) (Bauman, Merta & Steiner, 1999 ;Risberg, Stevens & Graybill, 1995), le Drug Involvement Scale for Adolescents (DISA) (Eggert, Herting & Thompson, 1996), le Adolescent Drug Involvement Scale (ADIS) (Moberg et Hahn, 1991), le Drug Use Screnning Inventory (DUSI) (Tarter et Hegedus, 1991), le Personal Experience Screening Questionnaire (PESQ) (Winters, 1992) et le CRAFFT (Knight, Sherritt, Shrier, Harris & Chang, 2002).…”
Section: Contexteunclassified
“…) (Hall et al, 1998). Au niveau des analyses de critère, la classification des instruments est généralement comparée à la classification du DSM-III-R (Martino et al, 2000 ;Risberg et al, 1995), du DSM-IV (Knight et al, 2002 ;Martino et al, 2000) ou à une consommation autorapportée en entrevue (Bauman et al, 1999). Cette classification est de type binaire.…”
Section: Contexteunclassified
“…The SMAQ appears to have a number of advantages relative to earlier screening instruments developed to detect adolescent problem drug use (Oetting et al, 1985;Petchers & Singer, 1990;Winters, 1992;Weed, Butcher & Williams, 1994;Kirisci, Mezzich & Tarter, 1995;Risberg, Stevens & Graybill, 1995;Dembo et al, 1997;Stinch eld & Winters, 1997):…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Original validation (Miller, 1990) indicated promising results in the correct classification of substance-dependent adolescents (83%); however, the test was somewhat less successful in correctly classifying adolescents without substance abuse (72%) or those denying substance abuse (69%). Whereas some researchers (see Piazza, 1996;Risberg, Stevens, & Graybill, 1995) Rogers, Cashel, Johansen, Sewell, and Gonzalez (1997) studied classification rates based on SASSI-A scores in a sample of dually diagnosed adolescent offenders in residential treatment. The SASSI-A was highly accurate in detecting substance abusers who openly admitted to substance use problems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Original validation (Miller, 1990) indicated promising results in the correct classification of substance-dependent adolescents (83%); however, the test was somewhat less successful in correctly classifying adolescents without substance abuse (72%) or those denying substance abuse (69%). Whereas some researchers (see Piazza, 1996;Risberg, Stevens, & Graybill, 1995) have found promising results when the SASSI was used to classify adolescent substance abusers and nonabusers (overall correct classification rates as high as approximately 90%), other researchers have obtained less favorable results. Bauman et al (1999) studied detection of substance abuse, depressive disorder, and conduct or oppositional defiant disorders using the SASSI-A with diagnoses determined by either a licensed psychologist or psychiatrist.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%