2022
DOI: 10.1080/14778238.2022.2064349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Validating and documenting a new knowledge management system philosophy: a case based on the ISO 30401:2018-KMS standard

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Este entendimento é corroborado por Schmitt (2022), ao afirmar que a ISO 30401:2018 promove um foco de Gestão do Conhecimento mais orientado para o processo, equilibrando aspectos tecnológicos com habilidades humanas e aspectos relacionados à confiança, a fim de estar melhor preparado no ambiente atual de diversidade e mudança de cenários.…”
Section: Análise Dos Resultados E Discussõesunclassified

ISO 30401 na prática: estudo de caso em uma organização certificada

Da Silva Almeida,
Furtado Schmitz de Souza,
Pereira Bez Fontana
et al. 2024
PRW
“…Este entendimento é corroborado por Schmitt (2022), ao afirmar que a ISO 30401:2018 promove um foco de Gestão do Conhecimento mais orientado para o processo, equilibrando aspectos tecnológicos com habilidades humanas e aspectos relacionados à confiança, a fim de estar melhor preparado no ambiente atual de diversidade e mudança de cenários.…”
Section: Análise Dos Resultados E Discussõesunclassified

ISO 30401 na prática: estudo de caso em uma organização certificada

Da Silva Almeida,
Furtado Schmitz de Souza,
Pereira Bez Fontana
et al. 2024
PRW
“…The potential fruitful co-evolution alluded to between the OKMS and PKMS approaches is not only based on the complementing features shown, but also supported by the benchmarking of the PKMS concepts and affordances (Schmitt, 2022b) against the maiden ISO 30401:2018-KMS Standard (ISO.org, 2018.…”
Section: Organizational Kms Versus Personal Kmsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…It favours personalized, generative, negentropic and community-based KM approaches (to be referred to as Personal KM System (PKMS)) allowing for a fruitful co-evolution with traditional institutional solutions. The most recent publications focused on digital threats and sustainability, prospective affordances and ecosystems, generative capacities, sustainability, visioneering, and compliance with the ISO 30401:2018-KMS Standard (Schmitt, 2021a(Schmitt, , 2022b. The 2022 transition from an academic DSR project to a Mauritian start-up business venture has, hence, just been a further logical step towards system realization (Schmitt, 2022a).…”
Section: From Academic Entrepreneurship To Incubating Start-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the ISO 9000 series standards consider knowledge to be a strategic resource and highlight the need to determine the knowledge necessary to properly develop the QMS processes and meet the corresponding requirements (Wilson and Campbell 2016). Schmitt (2022) notes that these standards offer a common language that can facilitate the integration of KM into the organisation and that favour auditing and certification processes, primarily for the purpose of informing and involving customers effectively. In addition, ISO 9001 includes requirements related to the knowledge, skills and aptitudes that people related to QMS must obtain (Wilson and Campbell 2020), thus enhancing the role played by people; furthermore, it does not require the use of complicated systems based on technological tools or complex information systems to manage knowledge (Demir et al 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%