From Academic Design Science Research to Start-up: Building a Digital Platform Ecosystem to Promote a Sustainable Knowledge Co-Creating Community

Abstract

As the new digital era is accompanied by accelerating change, people as well as institutions need to adapt and transform. Crucial for their success is how well leaders can cultivate the absorption and sharing of knowledge as a resource and its integration into the organisational endeavours. Innovative system designs may prove vital to providing crucial support.
 Based on a prior academic design science research project and published outputs, a recently established start-up aims to create a digital community platform for knowledge co-creation to serve members with diverse ambitions and potentials in their personal and collaborative contexts. The digital platform ecosystem follows a novel knowledge management approach by favouring personalization, mobility, generativity, and entropy reduction. How to sustainably address the inherent system complexities and scaling needs in an entrepreneurial environment known for short iterative cycles of minimum viable developments have proven to be an expected challenge, closely followed by the limited power of academic detail and lingo to create enthusiasm in start-up spaces where attention slots are measured in pitch decks and elevator rides.
 This paper looks at this particular case and at the lessons learnt in the transition phase from academia to a business incubation space and, hence, aims to contribute to the discourse between scholars, practitioners, and clients on how digital entrepreneurship and innovation spaces may be best served for mutual benefit.

A bibliometric analysis of the development of business incubation literature in South Africa

“…The study also analysed the most productive authors with regards to business incubation in South Africa. Figure 2 shows that Lose stands out as the prominent author with seven publications (Lose & Khuzwayo, 2021;Lose, 2021;Lose & Kapondoro, 2020;Lose, Yakobi & Kwahene, 2020;Lose, Tengeh, Maziriri, & Madinga, 2016;, followed by Rogerson (Rogerson, 2017;Masutha & Rogerson, 2015;Masutha & Rogerson, 2014a;Masutha & Rogerson, 2014b) and Tengeh (Lose, Tengeh, Maziriri, & Madinga, 2016;Lose & Tengeh, 2015) who have 4 publications each, Masutha (Masutha & Rogerson, 2015;Masutha & Rogerson, 2014a;Masutha & Rogerson, 2014b), and Strydom (Strydom, Kempen & Tselepis, 2023;Strydom, Kempen & Tselepis, 2021;Strydom, 2021) have 3 publications each, Iwu (Dlamini, Iwu, & Ogunlela, 2023;Eresia-Eke, Iwu, Jaiyeola & Musikavanhu, 2019) and Schmitt (Schmitt, 2023;Schmitt, 2022) with 2 publications each and the rest of the authors as shown have one publication each. The dataset of 254 keywords was limited to a minimum number of three occurrences, whereas 31 items met the threshold.…”