Vaccination refusal. Autonomy and permitted coercion

Abstract

The article presents vaccination obligation in relation to the existing or newly enacted legislation. Mass vaccinations and a wave of criticism they cause, forces us to reflect on the limits of medical intervention in the human body and the boundaries granted to individual's freedom and autonomy. This problem is universal and exists mainly in countries without mandatory vaccinations. Analyzing recent years, it must be underlined that a process in some legislatures has been introduced to enforce various forms of vaccination coercion. Although, refusing vaccinations has been treated liberally, the last wave of epidemics in the United States and Europe forced the creation of a different approach. Gradually in the USA, a duty (not a 'coercion') of vaccination is being enforced. Occurring epidemics, (e.g. measles) and dangers resulting from them, force authorities to violate the principle of autonomy and restrict individuals' freedoms regarding their own body. The article presents legal solutions relating to vaccinations in the United States and Europe i.e. administrative decisions imposing vaccinations, solutions conditioning social existence and financial penalties for not complying with this obligation and proposes a solution based on financial liability that will balance out patients' autonomy and public security.

Ethics of Vaccination in Childhood—A Framework Based on the Four Principles of Biomedical Ethics

“…Once herd immunity is established and the direct benefit of vaccination for an individual is low, the challenge is to maintain a sufficient level of immunity in a population [ 90 ]. Because education about risks and benefits is of limited value when herd immunity is achieved, it turned out in recent years that outbreaks of diseases (e.g., measles) can happen again in the countries with voluntary vaccination and not a sufficient degree of herd immunity [ 29 , 90 , 92 ]. To prevent outbreaks and protect also vulnerable members of society, obligatory vaccination is sometimes justified [ 5 , 61 , 87 , 93 , 94 , 95 ].…”

COVID-19 Vaccine Research and Ethical Issues in the Context of Gene Editing Technologies

“…Nitekim 1970'lerden beri zorunlu aşı uygulamasının kaldırıldığı Almanya' da aşı zorunluluğu şimdiden bilim adamları ve sağlık yöneticileri arasında tartışılmaya başlamıştır (55). Aşı reddinin toplumun sürü bağışıklığını ve riskli grupların hayatını tehlikeye atma riski, aşılarla ilişkilendirilen yan etkilere dair kaygılar ve bu kaygılardan beslenen aşı karşıtlığı ile özerklik ikilemi daha uzun süre tartışılmaya devam edecek gibi gözükmektedir (56,57).…”

Informed Consent in Obligatory Vaccinations?

“…Slovakia imposes fines up to €330 per parent and no objection to vaccination is possible (including the objection to abortion cell cultures in MMR vaccine despite 70% citizens’ declaration of being Catholic) [11]. In Poland, vaccination hesitancy is treated with a fine, which, even if paid, does not relieve parents of a vaccination obligation and no compensation is offered in case of adverse events [12,13]. In France, parents who refuse to vaccinate their children might face criminal charges (with up to 6 months in prison for child neglect/abuse) and might be fined €3750 [14].…”