1956
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.1956.01550010072010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vaccination for Recurrent Herpes Simplex Infection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1962
1962
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several conceivable reasom,. none of which sa1i..,fac101 ily explaim, why our incrdence of contac1 dermatitis is less than that reported (4). These authors u!>ed repeated insult patch te:,b which were performed on the upper arm; at this site, therc is litlle lipid.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…There are several conceivable reasom,. none of which sa1i..,fac101 ily explaim, why our incrdence of contac1 dermatitis is less than that reported (4). These authors u!>ed repeated insult patch te:,b which were performed on the upper arm; at this site, therc is litlle lipid.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Indeed, the inoculation of vesicle fluid into the forearm skin and the production of 'takes' was once an accepted therapeutic measure (Paulian, 1932;Hruszek, 1933;Lazar, 1956;Goldman, 1961) and the literature abounds with examples of similar experience in laboratory animals. Naturally occurring exogenous infections include some cases of traumatic herpes, including herpetic whitlows (Stern et al, 1959;Davies and Longson, 1970) and herpes gladiatorum (Porter and Baughman, 1965;Wheeler and Cabaniss, 1965).…”
Section: Exogenous Infectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immunological techniques, either by repeated autoinoculation of successive lesions as advocated by Hruszek (1933) or by multiple smallpox vaccinations as demonstrated by Schiff and Kern (1954) and earlier workers, are no longer regarded by most dermatologists as acceptable or effective forms of treatment. Lazar (1956) showed that a new disease site could be initiated after the use of unmodified material containing the live virus, and Kern and Schiff (1959) have negatived their earlier work by a controlled trial where they managed to " cure " nearly as many patients with a heatkilled inactive vaccine as with the active vaccine. These workers suggest that any benefit obtained may have been due to inoculation of foreign protein or other substances within the vaccine or to "suggestion."…”
Section: Discussioamentioning
confidence: 99%