2007
DOI: 10.1117/12.746655
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UV-NIL templates for the 22nm node and beyond

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher aspect ratios cause release failure, namely plug defects or pattern collapse. 35 In addition, the etching mask must be prepared from a resist pattern with a relatively thick residual layer (approximately 10 nm). For this reason, the etching resistance of UV-NIL resist is more important than that of photolithography.…”
Section: Dry Etching Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher aspect ratios cause release failure, namely plug defects or pattern collapse. 35 In addition, the etching mask must be prepared from a resist pattern with a relatively thick residual layer (approximately 10 nm). For this reason, the etching resistance of UV-NIL resist is more important than that of photolithography.…”
Section: Dry Etching Resistancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as feature sizes of the UV-NIL templates are the same as the wafer patterns, there are enormous challenges such as writing and inspecting smaller patterns for NIL template fabrication. In our previous works, we have achieved less than hp 16nm resolution with a 100keV spot beam writer and non CAR processes [1] . We also reported optimization of metrology for NIL templates [2] and the characterization of anti-sticking layers with scaning probe microscopies [3] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For an optical photomask, the minimum diameter of the particle that requires cleaning is ∼100 nm considering that the CD of a photomask is four times larger than that of wafer and ≤50 nm for EUV. In nanoimprint lithography (NIL), 6,7 a fine pattern is directly translated into a template without reduction; thus, the target minimum particle diameter is ∼10 nm. However, particles with diameters smaller than 100 nm are hard to remove, as described below.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%