2017
DOI: 10.21276/apjhs.2017.4.2.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Utility of ultrasonography in preanaesthetic airway assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study value of mean(cm) PES/E-VC were 2.10,2.00 for CL grade 1,2,and 2.46, 2.82 for CL grade 3,4 whereas Reddy et al [21] mean were 1.22,1.25,1.38 for CL grade 1, 2 ,3 not encounter patientsCLwith grade 4.…”
Section: Discussion:-contrasting
confidence: 49%
“…In our study value of mean(cm) PES/E-VC were 2.10,2.00 for CL grade 1,2,and 2.46, 2.82 for CL grade 3,4 whereas Reddy et al [21] mean were 1.22,1.25,1.38 for CL grade 1, 2 ,3 not encounter patientsCLwith grade 4.…”
Section: Discussion:-contrasting
confidence: 49%
“…The results of both studies are comparable. In the study by Reddy et al .,[18] the value of mean Pre-E/E-VC were 1.09 ± 0.38, 1.28 ± 0.37 for CL Grade 1 and 2, whereas for CL Grade 3, it was 1.29 ± 0.44. However, in the study, the authors did not encounter patient with CL 4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Seventeen studies have been considered for secondary outcome. [28][29][30][31][32][33]38,41,44,46,[48][49][50][51]53,59,64 Patients with difficult direct laryngoscopy had higher DSE, DSVC, and DSHB values than patients with easy laryngoscopy, with MD of 0.38 cm (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17-0.58 cm; P = .0004), 0.18 cm (95% CI, 0.01-0.35 cm; P = .04), and 0.23 cm (95% CI, 0.08-0.39 cm; P = .004), respectively (Figure 3; Supplemental Digital Content 1, Figures 4 and 5, http://links.lww.com/AA/D759). However, the level of heterogeneity was very high.…”
Section: Secondary Outcomementioning
confidence: 99%