“…Others, such as Posner (1996aPosner ( , 1996b and Posner and Rasmusen (1999, 382), emphasise the coercive power of state, suggesting the state can eliminate 'inefficient' or 'bad norms ' through criminal 196 S. Larcom sanctions. 23 More recently, Aldashev et al (2012), applying a bargaining in the shadow of the law model, suggest that greater access to state law courts will lead to convergence of non-state rules with state rules. However, we know that sometimes non-state groupings doggedly resist the state, raising the potential for long-lasting (or even persistent) instances of problematic legal pluralism.…”