Using swine farming wastewater for Signal grass cultivation

Homem, Bruno Grossi Costa; Tavares, Valdir Botega; Neto, Onofre Barroca de Almeida; Condé, Marisa Senra; Ferreira, Igor Machado; Silva, Mateus Diniz; Lara, Márcio André Stefanelli

doi:10.5433/1679-0359.2016v37n4supl1p2539

Cited by 5 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 11 publications

(16 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Although SW showed a significant effect on crude protein rate (CP) with mean values of 16.7 and 14.3% for irrigated and non-irrigated crops, respectively, irrigation did not have a significant effect (Fig 5). This was a result similar to that found by Homem et al (2016), who also observed that the SW doses led to an increasing linear behaviour of 4%. The dry matter digestibility "in vitro" was significant for the SW doses and irrigation, with an average value of 66%, close to that found by Melo et al (2016) on 'Piatã' grass (66.8%).…”

Section: Bromatological Parameters: Nutritive Value Of Foragesupporting

confidence: 79%

“…Irrigation showed a significant effect for TFY and LSY at all doses of SW applied (Fig 3). Homem et al (2016) worked with Brachiaria decumbens in greenhouse and also obtained increasing dry matter yields with increasing doses of SW, with an increase of 11.1 g pot -1 from the lowest to the highest SW dose.…”

Section: Yield Parameters Of Forage Dry Mattermentioning

confidence: 99%

“…When adequately treated, SW may have a high potential for use as fertilizers in agriculture (Kessler et al, 2013;Andrade et al, 2014;Abdoulkader et al, 2015;Egewarth et al, 2015;Homem et al, 2016).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Productivity and nutritional quality of Urochloa brizantha cv. BRS Piatã grass fertirrigated with swine wastewater in different seasons of the year

Gomes¹,

Sanches²,

Deboleto³

et al. 2017

Aust J Crop Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Brazilian swine production has been grown 38.9% in the last decade. Inherent to the process, the pollution potential has increased which brings environmental concerns, especially about the final disposal of swine wastewater (SW). In this context, this work aimed to evaluate the responses of 'Piatã' grass (Urochloa brizantha, cv. BRS 'Piatã') to the fertilization with SW, with and without supplemental irrigation. The experiment was carried out for one year from March 2014 to March 2015. The experiment was conducted in a split-plot with a random blocks experimental design with four replications. The treatments in the plots were referred to the use of irrigation (with and without), and in the subplots to the SW doses (four doses: 75, 150, 225 and 300 m 3 ha -1 ). In the irrigated treatment, the irrigation was fulfilled to re-establish soil moisture in the field capacity (Ө fc ). The parameters used to verify the treatments were: total forage yield (TFY), leaves and stems yield (LSY), crude protein rate (CP), neutral detergent fibre (NDF), acid detergent fibre (ADF) and in vitro dry matter digestibility (DivDM). There was a significant increasing effect for doses, reaching a mean TFY of 41.92 Mg ha -1 at the dose of 300 m 3 ha -1 . The combination of the highest dose of SW combined with supplemental irrigation produced the best results of TFY and LSY with (47.8 and 41.9 Mg ha -1 year -1 , respectively). Irrigation also led to the best results per cycle, with the highest forage accumulation in spring, 12.28 and 8.55 Mg ha -1 for irrigated and non-irrigated treatments, respectively. In the bromatological parameters, supplemental irrigation led to the highest average levels of CP, ADF and DivDM of 16.7%, 33.8% and 66.5%, respectively. The NDF did not respond to irrigation and SW doses. The research allowed concluding that irrigation and SW fertigation brought quantitative and qualitative benefits to 'Piatã' grass production.

show abstract

Section: Bromatological Parameters: Nutritive Value Of Foragesupporting

confidence: 79%

Section: Yield Parameters Of Forage Dry Mattermentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Productivity and nutritional quality of Urochloa brizantha cv. BRS Piatã grass fertirrigated with swine wastewater in different seasons of the year

Gomes¹,

Sanches²,

Deboleto³

et al. 2017

Aust J Crop Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…. Drummond et al (2006) reached herbage accumulation rate of 148.2 kg ha -1 day -1 of dry matter in grazing Tifton 85 fertilized with swine waste in the region of Uberaba -MG. Research works on pastures have presented linear increases of forage dry matter using doses of wastewater (Orrico junior et al, 2013;Andrade et al, 2014;Homem et al, 2016), with average accumulation doses of up to 170 kg ha -1 day -1 of DM in Tifton 85 grass using swine wastewater (Andrade et al, 2014). Vielmo et al (2011) used SW at doses of 0 to 320 m…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Grass production Tifton 85 and nutrient extraction with swine wastewater doses

Rezende¹,

Drumond²,

Carvalho³

et al. 2018

Afr. J. Agric. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Swine wastewater (SW) is considered as a source of nutrients for agriculture. The quantities and frequencies applied may vary according to the soil class, the nature and composition of the waste, the climatic conditions and the cultivated plant species. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the effects of application of five Swine wastewater doses (0, 500, 1000, 2000 and 2500 m³ ha-1) in the production of components and grass nutrient extraction Tifton 85 and changes in soil chemical properties after the end of the last application of swine wastewater. To achieve these goals, we evaluated the quantities of extracted nutrients, density and height of the pre-grazing grass, forage accumulation rate and carrying capacity. The experimental design was a randomized block. The production of dry matter was 18159.80 kg ha-1 , and the average height of 85 Tifton was 34.83 cm. The higher carrying capacity, 10 AU ha-1 was obtained with the dosage of 2500 m³ ha-1. While, the dose of 2000 m³ ha-1 supplied the nutritional needs of Tifton 85 in nitrogen, potassium, calcium, magnesium, copper, iron, zinc and boron. The quantities of extracted nutrients (kg ha-1) at grass Tifton 85 grazed were: N = 405.14; P = 57.77; K + = 387.69; Ca 2+ = 77.05; Mg 2+ = 49.68; S-SO4-2 = 31.48; B = 0.33; Cu 2+ = 0.20; Fe = 2.88; Mn 2+ = 4.61; Zn 2+ = 2.86. The application of increasing doses of SW promoted a linear increase in grass production components Tifton 85, as well, promoted changes in soil chemical properties and quantities of extracted nutrients.

show abstract

“…2013;Andrade et al, 2014;Homem et al, 2016), with average accumulation doses of up to 170 kg ha -1 day -1 of DM in Tifton 85 grass using swine wastewater (Andrade et al, 2014).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Application of swine wastewater for irrigation of Tifton 85 grass: Part I-productivity and nutritional quality

Gomes¹,

Sanches²,

Dias³

et al. 2018

Aust J Crop Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The use of swine wastewater (SW) for irrigation can be an excellent alternative to increase productivity and quality of pastures. This work was carried out from October 2013 to September 2014 in Dourados -MS. The objectives were evaluation of the productivity and nutritional quality of Tifton 85 grass (Cynodon spp.) under different doses of SW in the presence and absence of normal water irrigation. The experiment was set in a randomized block with split plots design, including water irrigated and non-irrigated in the main plots and four doses of SW in the subplots (75, 150, 225 and 300 m 3 ha -1 cut -1 ), with four replicates. The total forage yield and the bromatological value (crude protein, neutral and fibre detergent acid and dry matter digestibility) were evaluated. There was a significant effect of irrigation and SW doses on total dry matter yield, reaching 41.4 Mg ha -1 year -1 using the highest dose of SW (300 m 3 ha -1) and irrigation use. Irrigation also provided higher crude protein levels, increasing with linear adjustment to SW doses, reaching 17.9% in the annual average. The neutral detergent fibre and the acid detergent fibre presented lower results under irrigation, reaching 65.4 and 32.6% in the annual average, respectively, and linearly decreased using SW doses. Inverse behavior was observed in the in vitro digestibility of dry matter, which was higher under irrigation, reaching 69.5% in the annual average and presenting linear growth according to doses of SW.

show abstract

Using swine farming wastewater for Signal grass cultivation

Cited by 5 publications

References 11 publications

Productivity and nutritional quality of Urochloa brizantha cv. BRS Piatã grass fertirrigated with swine wastewater in different seasons of the year

Productivity and nutritional quality of Urochloa brizantha cv. BRS Piatã grass fertirrigated with swine wastewater in different seasons of the year

Grass production Tifton 85 and nutrient extraction with swine wastewater doses

Application of swine wastewater for irrigation of Tifton 85 grass: Part I-productivity and nutritional quality

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About