2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.vibspec.2017.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using PLS, iPLS and siPLS linear regressions to determine the composition of LDPE/HDPE blends: A comparison between confocal Raman and ATR-FTIR spectroscopies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Raman spectra of LDPE and HDPE are very similar, but it was observed that the maximum intensity of the Raman band at 1460 cm -1 increases with the reduction of LDPE in the polymer blend, while the opposite behavior is observed for the Raman shifts at 1370 and 1416 cm -1 . These spectral characteristics are the basis for operation of the multivariate calibration to quantify the composition of the LDPE/HDPE blends using confocal Raman spectra data [20] . Table 2 presents the optimal predictive models built by the CARS-PLS algorithm using several statistical pretreatment methods for the Raman data (the number of latent variables for cross-validation, type of cross-validation and number of runs were maintained constant, as described in the table label).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The Raman spectra of LDPE and HDPE are very similar, but it was observed that the maximum intensity of the Raman band at 1460 cm -1 increases with the reduction of LDPE in the polymer blend, while the opposite behavior is observed for the Raman shifts at 1370 and 1416 cm -1 . These spectral characteristics are the basis for operation of the multivariate calibration to quantify the composition of the LDPE/HDPE blends using confocal Raman spectra data [20] . Table 2 presents the optimal predictive models built by the CARS-PLS algorithm using several statistical pretreatment methods for the Raman data (the number of latent variables for cross-validation, type of cross-validation and number of runs were maintained constant, as described in the table label).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All CARS-PLS-based models presented more significant prediction performance with the interval containing the Raman shift at 2883 cm -1 (both amorphous and crystalline polyethylene phases) and 1445 cm -1 (only from the PE crystalline phase). In a previous work with Interval PLS linear regression [20] , we identified that the Raman signal at 2845 cm -1 , which regards the CH 2 asymmetric stretching in amorphous and crystalline phases, enables to obtain prediction models with the smallest RMSEP values (2.68-6.94 wt% of LDPE). The most plausible justification is associated to the intensity and width of Raman shifts (1370, 1416 and 1460 cm -1 ), which are not just related to the content of the polymer chemical groups, but also to the macromolecular organization of the polymeric chains.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…19,20 The peak at 2969 cm -1 in both pure drug and formulations indicates the symmetric stretching of CH 2 . 21 In the formulations, the intensity of the peaks has decreased along with the increase of TiO 2 concentration which indicated a possible binding of TiO 2 and Acceclofenc.…”
Section: Ftir Studymentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The synergy interval partial least squares (siPLS) regression permits the assembly and combination of spectral equidistant intervals to obtain regressions that generally provide more robust prediction models with lower errors for root‐mean‐square deviation of cross validation (RMSDCV) and root‐mean‐square estimation deviation (RMSED) (da Silva & Wiebeck, ). The siPLS model was evaluated based on stoichiometric indicators.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%