2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.01.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Using personalized feedback to reduce alcohol use among hazardous drinking college students: The moderating effect of alcohol-related negative consequences

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results are consistent with previous studies, in which feedback based computerized intervention is more effective for participants with specific individual characteristics at baseline, such as hazardous drinking students (Canale et al, 2015;Palfai et al, 2011), since students who are heavier drinkers may experience feedback as more relevant and salient than those who not drink so heavily (Elliott, Carey, & Bolles, 2008). It is interesting to observe that baseline FGs receiving intervention showed 14 more realistic attitudes toward the profitability of gambling (even if not significant), while baseline FGs receiving only the PF about estimated risk-status and tips for safer gambling, without additional training (interactive activities), showed significantly less realistic attitudes toward the profitability of gambling post-intervention.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results are consistent with previous studies, in which feedback based computerized intervention is more effective for participants with specific individual characteristics at baseline, such as hazardous drinking students (Canale et al, 2015;Palfai et al, 2011), since students who are heavier drinkers may experience feedback as more relevant and salient than those who not drink so heavily (Elliott, Carey, & Bolles, 2008). It is interesting to observe that baseline FGs receiving intervention showed 14 more realistic attitudes toward the profitability of gambling (even if not significant), while baseline FGs receiving only the PF about estimated risk-status and tips for safer gambling, without additional training (interactive activities), showed significantly less realistic attitudes toward the profitability of gambling post-intervention.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to examine a WBI implemented via the school for ninth grade students. In addition, since previous studies have suggested that the effectiveness of the intervention is moderated by individual differences at baseline, such as alcohol-related negative consequences (Canale, Vieno, Chieco, Santinello, & Andriolo, 2015;Palfai, Zisserson, & Saitz, 2011), a secondary objective was to examine whether the intervention would be differentially effective for frequent gamblers (FGs) at baseline (i.e., before intervention).…”
Section: The Present Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If sufficient data to calculate means and SDs for this outcome were not reported in the published article, authors were contacted. Data were provided by the authors for 3 studies [17,39,41]. Data on alcohol consumption that could be transformed into grams per week of ethanol were not collected in 2 studies [25,27] and insufficient data to calculate the weighted mean difference (WMD) in grams of ethanol per week were reported in 4 studies [23,28,29,42].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to seven participants being absent from the post-test, the data reported here concerned 124 college students (22 male and 102 female) with a mean age of 21.64 years (SD ¼ 2.58). Hazardous drinking students were identified as those who reported two or more heavy drinking episodes in the past month (6). The design was quasi-experimental (without randomization) and the two classes were assigned to two conditions: intervention (n ¼ 94, in undergraduate course) and control (n ¼ 30, in graduate course).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%