2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.471
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

User Involvement in the Co-design of Self-care Support Systems for Heart Failure Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multidisciplinary collaboration is often encouraged in UCD [ 6 , 65 , 66 ], including partnerships between designers and clinicians [ 67 , 68 ]. Those who have attempted such collaborations are aware of the methodological and cultural misalignment or divergent goals between Human-Computer Interaction technologists and clinicians [ 65 , 69 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multidisciplinary collaboration is often encouraged in UCD [ 6 , 65 , 66 ], including partnerships between designers and clinicians [ 67 , 68 ]. Those who have attempted such collaborations are aware of the methodological and cultural misalignment or divergent goals between Human-Computer Interaction technologists and clinicians [ 65 , 69 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether older adults with heart failure or adolescents with diabetes will use a health application, identifying the end-user and their needs at the start of the design process is pivotal for the next steps towards development [19,20]. Nevertheless, although the importance behind end-user evaluation has been signified, various studies confirm the lack of health apps available suiting their needs and capabilities [1,[21][22][23].…”
Section: Putting the End-user Firstmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Relevance Cycle, developers or researchers seek out to understand the end-user in the context of their environment [19]. It is the environment that shapes the specificities behind the arising problems, the purpose of this cycle is to provide the requirements for the health app, as well as set of criteria for users to evaluate its functionality [28,29].…”
Section: Information System Research (Isr) Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using gerontechnology's system approach of examining person, environment, and user interfaces (Sixsmith, Mihailidis, Sixsmith, Fang, & Battersby, 2016), we are moving beyond our earlier exit interviews and conducting weekly interviews with participants using the current tablet to elicit feedback, and asking them whether the tablet is helping and how. We are intentionally using a co-designing model (Aidemark, Askenäs, Nygårdh, & Strömberg, 2015), which includes older adults in developing ideas, concepts, prototypes (e.g., the app), and final products in iterative and interactive cycles. Our older adult co-designers suggested features that we had not considered, such as dietary trackers and making the app more fun.…”
Section: Does Health Care Technology Work For or Against Older Adults?mentioning
confidence: 99%