1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0968-090x(98)00005-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

User-equilibrium properties of fixed points in dynamic traffic assignment

Abstract: This paper considers the problem of dynamic traffic assignment under the principle that individual drivers will choose fastest paths, in the dynamic situation where path durations consist of time-dependent link travel times. Rather than constructing a unified model encompassing traffic dynamics and route choice, we decompose the model into an assignment mapping, which identifies the link travel times resulting from an input routing policy, and a routing mapping, which yields fastest-path routings associated wi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors investigated the impact such (limited) route guidance had on the individual travel times of the vehicles as well as the system average travel times. The results and performance of the sampled fictitious play algorithm were compared with those of the heretofore best method SAVaNT (Kaufman, Smith and Wunderlich, 1998). When the guided vehicles constituted 5% of the total number of vehicles, their average travel times were approximately 10% better than those of the unguided vehicles, with the system-wide average travel time of 17.22 minutes.…”
Section: Dynamic Traffic Routing Assignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors investigated the impact such (limited) route guidance had on the individual travel times of the vehicles as well as the system average travel times. The results and performance of the sampled fictitious play algorithm were compared with those of the heretofore best method SAVaNT (Kaufman, Smith and Wunderlich, 1998). When the guided vehicles constituted 5% of the total number of vehicles, their average travel times were approximately 10% better than those of the unguided vehicles, with the system-wide average travel time of 17.22 minutes.…”
Section: Dynamic Traffic Routing Assignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though this method can be proven to converge to a solution, it cannot be adapted to the user-optimal problem. Computational tests showed this algorithm to converge much more quickly than that of Kaufman et al [29].…”
Section: Centralized and Predictive Route Guidancementioning
confidence: 78%
“…Kaufman et al [29] considers the computation of user-equilibrium Dynamic Traffic Assignment. It uses a model that combines an assignment mapping of flows to paths and a routing mapping that computes resulting sets of fastest paths.…”
Section: Dynamic Traffic Assignmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The models for dynamic traffic assignment can be classified into five categories according to research methods: Computer simulating [1,2]; Mathematical programming [3,4]; Optimal control theory [5,6]; Variational inequality (VI) and non-linear complementarity [7,8,9,10]; Fixed point theory [11]. The dynamic traffic assignment model based on computer simulating gives route choices of travellers by iteration, but it cannot guarantee the convergence and precision of solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%