Usefulness of Patients-Reported Outcomes in Rheumatoid Arthritis Focus Group

Abstract

Objective. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have become an essential part of the assessment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We aimed to evaluate the agreement and correlation between PROs and the physician's measurements. Methods. This was a cross-sectional analytical study in which 135 patients with RA were clinically evaluated during two different sessions of focus group interviews. Rheumatologist recorded 28 swollen (SJCs) and tender joint counts (TJCs). The patients filled out the PROs instruments (MDHAQ, RADAI, RAPID3, 4, and 5 and self-report articular index (SAI) diagram for pain and joint swelling). DAS28 was calculated (C-reactive protein). An adjusted multiple lineal regression model was done (DAS28 as dependent variable). Results. Highly significant agreements were found between SJC and TJC registered by the physician and patient. There was moderate correlation between DAS28 with patient SJC (r = 0.52), patient TJC (r = 0.55), RADAI (r = 0.56), RAPID3 (r = 0.52), RAPID4 (r = 0.56), RAPID5 (r = 0.66), and VAS-Global (r = 0.51). Likewise, we found moderate to high correlations between CDAI and SDAI with all variable measurements done by the patients. The resulting predictive equation was DAS28(CRP) = 2.02 + 0.037 × RAPID4 + 0.042× patient SJC. Conclusion. PROs applied in focus groups interview are a useful tool for managing patients with RA regardless of gender, educational level, and duration of disease.

Impact of Total Knee Arthroplasty as Assessed Using Patient‐Reported Pain and Health‐Related Quality of Life Indices: Rheumatoid Arthritis Versus Osteoarthritis

“…Third, our study lacks any physician‐reported clinical, laboratory, or radiographic measures. Patient‐reported outcome measures are more subjective in nature and can vary greatly among patients, possibly leading to certain unavoidable biases . Unlike other investigators , we did not use focus groups, but rather collected data on a more individual basis to maintain reproducibility.…”

Interplay between patient global assessment, pain, and fatigue and influence of other clinical disease activity measures in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis

“…In this study, the relationship between these scores was assessed on the group level as well as on the individual patient level in RA patients with active disease initiating biological treatment. Previous studies investigating predictors of PaGl, pain, and fatigue and other measures of disease activity have universally focused on associations on the group level using correlation and regression analyses [28,29]. Although the correlation between two measures may seem strong, the variation around the regression line may be substantial and the predictability of one measure from another may be poor in individual subjects [27].…”

Validity of the Patient‐Rated Wrist Evaluation questionnaire in rheumatoid arthritis

“…However, such clinician‐based outcome measures may sometimes fail to notice the patient's daily life difficulties. Available data strongly emphasize that the assessment methods should also include patient‐reported outcome measures . The Patient‐Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) questionnaire, Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHOQ), and Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire are among the most commonly used patient‐reported outcome measures in hand therapy .…”