‘Useful, usable and used’: Sustaining an Australian model of cross-faculty service learning by concentrating on shared value creation

Andersen, Lisa

doi:10.5130/ijcre.v10i0.5574

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 13 publications

(13 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Likewise, there are authors such as: Loosemore and Lim (2018), Bode and Singh (2018) and Lim and Loosemore (2017) who have recently developed the concept of SV from the perspective of CSR. Likewise, current studies are presented based on the creation of SV from the point of view of the theory of stakeholders (Andersen, 2017;Maillefert and Robert, 2017;Nikolova and Andersen, 2017;Uribe et al, 2018).…”

Section: Development and Current Trends Of The Concept Of Shared Valu...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Shared value: a bibliometric review of the literature from the approaches of strategy, corporate social responsibility and stakeholder

Maestre-Matos¹,

Cabas²,

Lombana³

2020

cuad.adm.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The recent rise of the Shared Value (SV) concept justifies the debate about its possible conceptual developments. The objective of this article is to analyze the conceptual evolution of the SV showing its approaches from strategy, corporate social responsibility (CSR) and stakeholders. The methodology used for research consists of a systematic review of the literature, using as input for the classification of articles, the graphs theory and a bibliometric analysis through the Tree of Science (ToS) tool. The analysis focuses on the evolution of the concept of SV (start, development and trends) observing the maintenance of the original approaches and new trends in concept application. It is concluded that although the origin of the SV does not yet have a defined consensus, there are some coincident characteristics for its application, such as: creation of mutual value, integration of economic and social value and the generation of positive impacts on stakeholders.

show abstract

Section: Development and Current Trends Of The Concept Of Shared Valu...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Shared value: a bibliometric review of the literature from the approaches of strategy, corporate social responsibility and stakeholder

Maestre-Matos¹,

Cabas²,

Lombana³

2020

cuad.adm.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Yet, while limited, there is some literature that examines potential models, structures, and strategies for coordinating community-university partnerships (Watson-Thompson 2015;Mehta et al 2015;Barkin et al 2013;Andersen 2017). For example, Anderson and McLachlan (2016) discuss a knowledge mobilization framework for community-university partnerships that they claim is high in impact and relevant for working toward a more just and resilient society.…”

Section: Strengths and Limitations Of Community-university Collaboratmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards a Framework for Building Community-University Resilience Research Agendas

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, we ask: "How can we scope multiyear, multiscalar community-university collaborations that draw on the university's diverse resources and contribute to community resilience"? We approach this question by presenting the development and application of the Advancing Collaborative Transdisciplinary Scholarship Framework (the "ACTS Framework") which we argue has been successful at helping us better understand, foster, and work towards communities' resilience. The ACTS Framework, informed by our collective expertise in critical community-engaged scholarship (CES) and community resilience, contributes to knowledge and practice in critical CES, in particular by providing guidance for scoping and sustaining complex community-university collaborations. The structured yet iterative process involved in the framework development and application affirms and extends the work of other scholars interested in the links between CES and community resilience. Our contributions offer two other important practices-centring community concerns and facilitating cross-project collaboration-to critical CES knowledge and practice and highlight two promising practices of linking structures that facilitate community-university collaborations-specifically, a well-organized institutional memory and holding and bridging relationships.

show abstract

Principles in Practice

Morton

Varghese

Jackson

et al. 2022

Research Anthology on Service Learning and Community Engagement Teaching Practices

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This chapter offers faculty and institutional leaders a set of principles and practical approaches for designing and supporting courses that develop and mentor emerging community engaged scholars at the undergraduate and graduate levels. The learning outcomes and design features of these courses provide students with opportunities to develop knowledge, skills, and values that are required for undertaking ethical sustainable critical community engaged scholarship (CCES). The chapter begins with an overview of the CCES framework that guides the authors' specific courses and thier commitments to supporting the development of community-engaged scholars more broadly. The chapter describes several courses that share the CCES framework but vary by size, disciplinary foundation, and engaged-learning approach. These courses are used to consider the development of students' capacities and values, the interplay between CCES and pedagogical best practices, and the role of institutional supports in enabling CCES and navigating institutional challenges to community-engaged teaching and learning.

show abstract

‘Useful, usable and used’: Sustaining an Australian model of cross-faculty service learning by concentrating on shared value creation

Cited by 4 publications

References 13 publications

Shared value: a bibliometric review of the literature from the approaches of strategy, corporate social responsibility and stakeholder

Shared value: a bibliometric review of the literature from the approaches of strategy, corporate social responsibility and stakeholder

Towards a Framework for Building Community-University Resilience Research Agendas

Principles in Practice

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About