2006
DOI: 10.3141/1977-19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Walk Opportunities Index to Quantify Local Accessibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The "complementarity" hypothesis was also confirmed in the final models in which intersection density (for the local action space models) and regional jobs accessibility (for the regional action space models) showed the strongest and most significant relationships with VKT. Consistent with previous research, increased intersection density and-consequently-area connectivity (see Boarnet, Nesamani, and Smith 2004, Chapman and Frank 2004, Chatman 2008, Cervero et al 2009) and increased regional jobs accessibility (see Miller and Ibrahim 1998, Sun, Wilmot, and Kasturi 1998, Kuzmyak, Baber, and Savory 2006, Cervero and Duncan 2006 are associated with lower VKT. Elasticity estimates for the first parameter in this study varied between -0.027 and -0.072 and between 0.065 and 0.067 for the second parameter.…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…The "complementarity" hypothesis was also confirmed in the final models in which intersection density (for the local action space models) and regional jobs accessibility (for the regional action space models) showed the strongest and most significant relationships with VKT. Consistent with previous research, increased intersection density and-consequently-area connectivity (see Boarnet, Nesamani, and Smith 2004, Chapman and Frank 2004, Chatman 2008, Cervero et al 2009) and increased regional jobs accessibility (see Miller and Ibrahim 1998, Sun, Wilmot, and Kasturi 1998, Kuzmyak, Baber, and Savory 2006, Cervero and Duncan 2006 are associated with lower VKT. Elasticity estimates for the first parameter in this study varied between -0.027 and -0.072 and between 0.065 and 0.067 for the second parameter.…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Accessibility can also be understood as the availability of destinations for pedestrians. For example, the walking opportunities index (Kuzmyak, Baber, & Savory, 2006) is based on the number, character, and desirability of activities within a given walking distance.…”
Section: Accessibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transit-oriented development and the presence of nonautomobile facilities are well-documented means of reducing vehicle trip-generation rates and improving the internal capture of activity centers (Kuzmyak et al 2006;ABAG, 2008;Arrington & Cervero, 2008). More research is needed to quantify these values in the context of a subregional travel model, however, where intrazonal trips are typically not loaded onto the network and benefits may therefore not be measured.…”
Section: How Is the Measure Of "Adequacy" Contextsensitive?mentioning
confidence: 99%