Stay local or go regional? Urban form effects on vehicle use at different spatial scales: A theoretical concept and its application to the San Francisco Bay Area

Abstract

This paper explores the respective roles of local and regional characteristics of urban form on vehicle travel. We hypothesize that the effects of urban form on vehicle use at the local and regional levels are complementary, and we introduce the concept of local and regional action spaces, which are defined based on the accessibility of alternative means of transport within an acceptable travel time, to test this hypothesis. Multilevel and ordered logit models are developed for the San Francisco Bay Area to estimate the effects of urban form and socioeconomic characteristics on vehicle kilometers traveled (VKT) and vehicle trip frequency (for work, shopping, and social/recreational purposes). We find that the two urban scale characteristics exert complementary effects on VKT. However, because people in the San Francisco Bay Area display significantly lower VKT in the local than in the regional action space, we conclude that regional-scale interventions would contribute more to the policy objective of VKT reduction, although local-scale design policies might also help reach this policy goal. Intersection density (for the local action space models) and regional jobs accessibility (for the regional action space models) demonstrated the strongest and most significant relationships with VKT. The built environment did not appear to significantly affect vehicle trip frequency, which is likely due to the uniformly high levels of vehicle use in both the local and regional action spaces in the area.

Life-Cycle Asset Management in Residential Developments Building on Transport System Critical Attributes via a Data-Mining Algorithm

“…Intrinsically, importance indices from this study for network coverage and quality of ride show that the commuters assume upper and lower bounds of journey time regardless of mode choice, in line with past works [111]. Any deviation in either direction causes a positive/negative ripple in commuter predilection of the service depending upon the journey time, confirming findings from previous research (see Hensher,Stopher [97]).…”

Accessibility instruments in planning practice: Bridging the implementation gap

“…New questions have arisen around, for instance, local versus regional accessibility, the benefits of high accessibility with low mobility, amongst others. Some evidence of innovative research following these new premises are for instance Milakis et al (2015a) and Milakis et al (2015b …”

Residential location, commuting and non-work travel in two urban areas of different size and with different center structures

“…Travel behavior is contextual, and therefore built environment attributes that may influence travel behavior at certain spatial scales may be less relevant in other spatial contexts (Dieleman et al, 2002, Kwan, 2012, Kwan and Weber, 2008, Milakis et al, 2015. Furthermore, moderating effects due to traveler's idiosyncratic characteristics may have an amplifying or diminishing influence on the observed outcome between built environment characteristics and travel behavior.…”

“…This, at least in part, is likely the result of geographic scale. Like many built environment variables, the influence of neighborhood density on travel behavior is not scale invariant (Milakis and van Wee, 2015). Higher local density, by creating the conditions for higher local accessibility by non-motorized transport, may influence modal split for local travel.…”