2002
DOI: 10.1021/la011142p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of the Atomic Force Microscope To Determine the Effect of Substratum Surface Topography on Bacterial Adhesion

Abstract: Changes in surface roughness and topography on the macroscopic scale are known to affect bacterial attachment and retention. Little quantitative information is available as to how changes in surface topography on the micron and submicron scale affect the strength of bacterial attachment to substrata. A novel method is described using the atomic force microscope where a varying shear/lateral force (in nanonewtons) is used to detach individual bacterial cells from various substrata of different surface topograph… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
103
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(108 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a positive correlation between protein adsorption and short-term bacterial attachment with surface property changes (Cunliffe et al 2003). Also, the strength of bacterial attachment has been positively correlated to surface topography (Boyd et al 2002). Detachment of bacteria is affected by surface properties (Powell and Slater 1982) and bacteria are most readily removed from the smoothest, most hydrophilic, neutral surfaces (Pasmore et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…There is a positive correlation between protein adsorption and short-term bacterial attachment with surface property changes (Cunliffe et al 2003). Also, the strength of bacterial attachment has been positively correlated to surface topography (Boyd et al 2002). Detachment of bacteria is affected by surface properties (Powell and Slater 1982) and bacteria are most readily removed from the smoothest, most hydrophilic, neutral surfaces (Pasmore et al 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Boyd et al (8) found that enhanced adhesion of S. aureus occurred on rougher stainless steel compared to its adhesion on smooth surfaces. Surfaces with features on the same scale as the S. aureus cells (1 m) appeared to promote the strongest attachment due to maximal cell-substrate contact area.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, in concurrence with D. S. Rimai et al (9) , they mentioned that changes in the contact areas between the substrate and sphere are non-linear but they did not clearly mention the reasons behind this. R. D. Boyd et al (10) recognized that the roughness and surface shape of the substrate influenced the attachment and resistance against bacteria over substrate, and requested the force, which is needed for the removal of the bacteria cell, by decreasing abrading using a commercial cantilever against the bacteria cell over a stainless substrate. Also, there are reports on controlling the various surface effects in a micro contact surface, effectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%