2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2009.00039.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of suppression subtractive hybridization to identify genetic differences between differentially virulent genotypes of Paenibacillus larvae, the etiological agent of American Foulbrood of honeybees

Abstract: Paenibacillus larvae is the causative agent of American Foulbrood of honeybees, a fatal brood disease not only killing infected larvae but also lethal to infected colonies. Recently four different genotypes of P. larvae (enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus I-IV) have been described and it was shown that these genotypes also differ in phenotype, especially in virulence. To unravel the genetic differences between these four genotypes, suppression subtractive hybridization was used. From 106 analysed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
63
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(102 reference statements)
3
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This became evident with the recent publication of two complete, manually curated and annotated P. larvae sequences representing the genomes of P. larvae ERIC I (strain DSM25719, 4 579 589 bp, 4868 predicted protein-coding genes) and ERIC II (DSM25430, 4 056 006 bp, 3928 predicted protein-coding genes) [17 ]. These data provided significant progress in elucidating the genomic potential of P. larvae and allowed an in silico comparative genome analysis [17 ] which confirmed considerable differences between the genomes of P. larvae ERIC I and II as previously suggested by suppression subtractive hybridization [18]. In both genomes, a large number of mobile genetic elements and prophage regions were found as well as genomic regions containing repeats and repetitive sequences.…”
Section: Different Genotypes Within the Species P Larvaesupporting
confidence: 76%
“…This became evident with the recent publication of two complete, manually curated and annotated P. larvae sequences representing the genomes of P. larvae ERIC I (strain DSM25719, 4 579 589 bp, 4868 predicted protein-coding genes) and ERIC II (DSM25430, 4 056 006 bp, 3928 predicted protein-coding genes) [17 ]. These data provided significant progress in elucidating the genomic potential of P. larvae and allowed an in silico comparative genome analysis [17 ] which confirmed considerable differences between the genomes of P. larvae ERIC I and II as previously suggested by suppression subtractive hybridization [18]. In both genomes, a large number of mobile genetic elements and prophage regions were found as well as genomic regions containing repeats and repetitive sequences.…”
Section: Different Genotypes Within the Species P Larvaesupporting
confidence: 76%
“…However, one characteristic of P. larvae is that it is consistently isolated as pure culture from AFB dead larvae (White, 1906) indicating that P. larvae itself obviously produces potent antibiotics as confirmed recently (Fünfhaus et al, 2009). Therefore, the efficacy of antagonistic bacteria against P. larvae infection in vivo remains to be shown.…”
Section: Afb Controlmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In an examination of P. larvae genotypes ERIC I -IV, a strain-specific genomic sequence (Fl 763330) with 46% similarity to an ABC transporter ATP-binding protein from Lactococcus lactis ssp. cremoris MG1363 was identified [35]. An interesting future direction of research, therefore, would be to determine whether hyperforin or structural derivatives thereof potentially upregulate the expression of this gene in this particular strain of P. larvae.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%