2012
DOI: 10.1590/s0101-20612012005000012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of real-time PCR to evaluate two DNA extraction methods from food

Abstract: The DNA extraction is a critical step in Genetically Modified Organisms analysis based on real-time PCR. In this study, the CTAB and DNeasy methods provided good quality and quantity of DNA from the texturized soy protein, infant formula, and soy milk samples. Concerning the Certified Reference Material consisting of 5% Roundup Ready® soybean, neither method yielded DNA of good quality. However, the dilution test applied in the CTAB extracts showed no interference of inhibitory substances. The PCR effi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The efficiency of both extraction methods was evaluated by the amount and quality of DNA extracted from samples using spectrophotometric measurements, namely ratios A 260 / A 280 and A 260 / A 230 . Values between 1.8 and 2.0 for A 260 / A 280 indicate low levels of contamination by protein and aromatic substances, and values above 2 for A 260 / A 230 indicate the absence of PCR inhibitors such as polysaccharides, salts, lipids and phenolic compounds . The A 260 / A 280 values show that both methods provided good DNA quality for all samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The efficiency of both extraction methods was evaluated by the amount and quality of DNA extracted from samples using spectrophotometric measurements, namely ratios A 260 / A 280 and A 260 / A 230 . Values between 1.8 and 2.0 for A 260 / A 280 indicate low levels of contamination by protein and aromatic substances, and values above 2 for A 260 / A 230 indicate the absence of PCR inhibitors such as polysaccharides, salts, lipids and phenolic compounds . The A 260 / A 280 values show that both methods provided good DNA quality for all samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…According to published reports, CTAB‐extracted DNA needs further purification to be used for real‐time PCR . However, in previous studies it has been suggested that, in spite of the fact that DNA extracted using the CTAB method may possess some substances inhibitory for qPCR, dilutions were enough to remove all the inhibition …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several methods have been developed for GMO detection and quantitation, mostly based on DNA techniques, since protein-based methods are not reliable for highly processed food analysis (Branquinho et al, 2012;Randhawa et al, 2014;Fraiture et al, 2014;Song et al, 2014). However, PCR (Mullis & Faloona, 1987) have become essential for the control of the presence of genetically modified DNA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In literature, the DCt model was used not only for the analysis of gene expression (Livak & Schmittgen, 2001) but also for the comparison of real-time methods at quantification of molds in foods (Rodríguez, C ordoba, Gordillo, C ordoba, & Rodríguez, 2012) and evaluation of DNA extraction methods (Branquinho, Ferreira, & Cardarelli-Leite, 2012). In this work, we used the DCt values to monitorthe changes in DNA amplicability in the course of pickling process.…”
Section: Quantitative Pcr Analysis Of Dnas Isolated From Processed mentioning
confidence: 99%