2016
DOI: 10.1093/forestry/cpw008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of low point density ALS data to estimate stand-level structural variables in Mediterranean Aleppo pine forest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
37
0
6

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
8
37
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…The location of the field plots was selected, within the limits of the Aleppo pine stands at the unburned area, using a stratified random sampling technique, in order to achieve a representative sample of the variability of the terrain (Naesset & Økland, 2002), forest structure and tree density (Montealegre et al, 2016). Thereby, terrain slopes, tree height and canopy cover of the study area were derived from ALS point cloud to define homogeneous areas.…”
Section: Field Plot Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The location of the field plots was selected, within the limits of the Aleppo pine stands at the unburned area, using a stratified random sampling technique, in order to achieve a representative sample of the variability of the terrain (Naesset & Økland, 2002), forest structure and tree density (Montealegre et al, 2016). Thereby, terrain slopes, tree height and canopy cover of the study area were derived from ALS point cloud to define homogeneous areas.…”
Section: Field Plot Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, some studies have used low-density ALS data to estimate forest parameters such as tree height, crown diameter, basal area, stem density, volume (Guerra-Hernández, Tomé, & González-Ferreiro, 2016a;Hayashi, Weiskittel, & Sader, 2014;Holopainen et al, 2010;Mehtätalo, Virolainen, Tuomela, & Packalen, 2015;Montealegre, Lamelas, de la Riva, García-Martín, & Escribano, 2016;Naesset, 2002;Naesset & Økland, 2002;Popescu, Randolph, & Ross, 2003) as well as biomass (García-Gutiérrez, Martínez-Álvarez, Troncoso, & Riquelme, 2015;Guerra-Hernández et al, 2016b;Hall, Burke, Box, Kaufmann, & Stoker, 2005;Montagnoli et al, 2015;Shendryk, Margareta, Leif, Natascha, 2014). In addition, some of them have compared different point densities (González-Ferreiro et al, 2013;Singh, Gang, James, & Ross, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, for both RF and RT models, height-based variables contributed more than volume-based variables, and the variance of height was one of the most contributing variables. This could be explained through the work of Montealegre et al [48], whose second figure shows the vertical distribution of LiDAR point data of Aleppo pines under three height groupings: short, medium and tall. They reported that the variance of the vertical distribution is larger for the taller Aleppo pines, which implies that the variance of height is closely related to canopy height at a plot or stand level.…”
Section: Comparison Of Plot-level Height Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CHM metrics with corresponding description and explanation of the calculation are summarized in Table 3. [16], was applied to develop the stand-level volume models. In total, 548 forest stands were used in the statistical analyses, out of which 274 were selected for the models' development and the other 274 stands for the models' validation.…”
Section: Chm Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among a number of potential predictors (CHM metrics and FMP variables), only variables that were highly correlated with field estimated stand volume (r ≥ ±0.5) were included in the backward stepwise regression. This type of regression is commonly used for linear modeling of forest attributes based on either image-based [22,24] or ALS-based [16,56] metrics. To justify the use of linear regression models, four principal statistical assumptions [57] were tested: (i) linearity and additivity of the relationship between dependent and independent variables (scatterplots of Remote Sens.…”
Section: Chm Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%