1994
DOI: 10.1080/01449299408914589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usability testing — on a budget: a NASA usability test case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, these tools are generally not documented and not made available for use outside of the organization. The case studies of usability efforts in commercial organizations (for examples, see [Hertzum, 1999, Szczur, 1994) discuss the processes used to perform usability testing and the resulting impact but not the tools used to support the processes. One exception is a panel discussion about in-house usability tools that included representatives from several major companies as panel members [Weiler, 1993].…”
Section: Tools Not Included In the Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, these tools are generally not documented and not made available for use outside of the organization. The case studies of usability efforts in commercial organizations (for examples, see [Hertzum, 1999, Szczur, 1994) discuss the processes used to perform usability testing and the resulting impact but not the tools used to support the processes. One exception is a panel discussion about in-house usability tools that included representatives from several major companies as panel members [Weiler, 1993].…”
Section: Tools Not Included In the Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These variations and pauses indicate a lack of control when compared to an idealised 'perfect' cursor movement. Tasks were initially given a quality rating of 5 (perfect) [20], with subsequent errors reducing the quality until the task was completed or failed, and the next task started. To reflect the consequences of generating each error type, the quality factors were weighted, giving a simple formula for quality ( Figure 1).…”
Section: Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…efficiency and ease of use) of the system (e.g. Szczur ; Haklay and Tobón ; Aggett and McColl ), and the validation of decision support models that were incorporated into the system (e.g. Srdjevic ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%