2017
DOI: 10.1111/pirs.12177
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

US regional population growth 2000–2010: Natural amenities or urban agglomeration?

Abstract: Abstract. Using a spatial hedonic growth model, this paper empirically examines the relative roles of natural amenities and urban agglomeration economies as determinants of U.S. regional growth patterns from 2000 to 2010. Natural amenities and urban agglomeration are measured using the USDA Economic Research Service county classification codes. The general finding is that natural amenities and urban agglomeration both influenced regional growth. However, the natural amenity ranking is estimated to be positivel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We begin the analysis with 2002 because of data availability of average housing prices at the city level. The length of the time period covers the majority of the post-reform period and approximately matches the length of the time spans of previous applications of the spatial equilibrium growth model: the decade-based analysis of GT (2008) for the last half of the twentieth century, 1990–2000 for Rickman and Rickman (2011), and 2000–2010 for Rickman and Wang (2017).…”
Section: Empirical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…We begin the analysis with 2002 because of data availability of average housing prices at the city level. The length of the time period covers the majority of the post-reform period and approximately matches the length of the time spans of previous applications of the spatial equilibrium growth model: the decade-based analysis of GT (2008) for the last half of the twentieth century, 1990–2000 for Rickman and Rickman (2011), and 2000–2010 for Rickman and Wang (2017).…”
Section: Empirical Implementationmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…With this perspective in mind, rethinking territorial strategies and social policies enhancing the resilience of local communities and containing demographic shrinkage in rural districts are, therefore, imperative in the present economic setting [52]. Regional planning oriented towards a complex adaptive system thinking-moving from local to regional resilience-contributes to development paths that are together sustainable and resistant to disturbances [146][147][148]. Assuming that a planning approach oriented toward resilient thinking would secure local communities from the destructive impact of external shocks [149,150], the notion of 'demographically resilient' districts seems to be an appropriate requisite in the identification of homogeneous socioeconomic dynamics that are resultingly particularly stable over space and balanced over time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of natural amenities has long shaped the urban‐to‐rural population redistribution and “the improvement (or degradation) of natural amenities will attract migrants into (or drive residents out of) the region” (Chi & Ventura, 2011a: 557). While some studies (see, for instance, Cheshire & Magrini, 2006; Duranton, 2016; Fukuda, 2012; Rapapport, 2007) focus on weather/climate conditions, others capture natural amenities with measures such as the proximity of a coast, the percentage of forest, water, and/or wetland coverage, the lengths of lakeshores/rivers and coastlines or viewsheds (Chi & Marcouillier, 2013; Rickman & Wang, 2017). A few studies also highlight the presence of spatial heterogeneities in the way natural amenities affect population growth.…”
Section: Background Literature: Determinants Of Population Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%