Urologists’ usage and perceptions of urological apps

Abstract

We conducted a survey of urologists to document their patterns of app usage and perceptions of app quality, and to assess their interest in future app usage. The survey was sent to all urologists on the mailing list of the British Association of Urological Surgeons (BAUS) (n=1613). A total of 115 responses were received (a response rate of 7%). Most respondents (89%) owned mobile devices capable of downloading apps. Most respondents (79%) used apps and about half (49%) used urological apps; the latter accessed a mean of 2.4 urological apps per month. Significantly more younger (defined as <45 years old) than older urologists used urological apps (P<0.001). Respondents' perception of the overall quality of apps produced for both urologists and patients was relatively low. The respondents' interest in future app usage was strong. There was greatest interest in apps such as logbooks or revalidation ones (87%), reference apps (86%) and ones which aided decision-making (85%). There was considerable support for the implementation of measures to provide urological app quality assurance; most respondents believed app peer review (78%) and validation (78%) would be beneficial and 48% supported regulatory oversight. There appears to be a need for high quality urological apps and opportunities therefore exist for national urological associations and academic units to lead developments.

Perceptions of Older Men Using a Mobile Health App to Monitor Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Tamsulosin Side Effects: Mixed Methods Study

“…In our study, patients were unanimously willing to share this health data with their clinicians with the goal of optimizing their urologic care. Likewise, in a British study, urologists reported considerable interest in incorporating various mobile apps into their urologic practices [20]. Leveraging the doctor-patient relationship in the early phases of using the PERSONAL app would likely mitigate both patient confusion regarding which symptoms are medication side effects versus isolated symptoms, as well as clinician confusion when their patients ask to discuss data from a mobile app they are using to track their symptoms.…”

Uro mHealth: Gesundheits-Apps in der Urologie

“…Einige der international renommiertesten Urologie-Bücher wie das "Oxford Handbook of Urology" sind heute als App verfügbar. Fachzeitschriften wie "European Urology" bieten Apps mit ergänzenden Podcasts und Videos zu den Druckausgaben an [10]. Die "UroApp" © läd als soziales Netzwerk speziell für Urologen zum fachlichen Diskurs ein und bietet darüber hinaus die Möglichkeit zum niederschwelligen Austausch [43].…”

“…In einer Befragung unter kanadischen und deutschen Assistenzärzten in der Weiterbildung zum Facharzt für Urologie aus dem Jahr 2017 antworten 89 % der Teilnehmer, durchschnittlich 10 Minuten täglich Apps in ihrem Arbeitsalltag zu nutzen [9]. In Großbritannien wendeten junge Ärzte deutlich häufiger urologische Apps an als ihre älteren Kollegen [10]. Da aber auch zunehmend ältere Menschen Smartphones besitzen und in den nachfolgenden Generationen die Nutzungsrate nahe 100 % liegt, wird dieser Unterschied in den kommenden Jahren geringer werden.…”

Surgical Learning Application (app) for Smartphones and Tablets

“…In a survey of 115 urologists, data showed that they believe peer review (78%) and validation (78%) would be beneficial, and 48% supported regulatory oversight for medical app quality. 5 Despite medical apps seen as a promising surgical learning tool, they lack quality assessment, and there are doubts if they are an effective educational tool.…”