2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2015.12.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uranium isotopic ratio measurements of U 3 O 8 reference materials by atom probe tomography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The atom probe provides a unique tool for investigating the nanoscale isotopic composition of minerals. Benchmarking of atom probe analysis of U isotopes in certified U 3 O 8 reference materials has shown that major isotopic ratios agree with known compositional values (Fahey et al ) and there are comparative thermal ion mass spectrometry (TIMS) and atom probe studies that show that Re‐Os analysis by atom probe may yield similar, though less precise, ages to more traditional TIMS analyses (Daly et al ). A number of studies have also investigated the mechanisms that can affect the distribution of radiogenic 207 Pb/ 206 Pb ratios in zircon (Figure ; Valley et al , , Peterman et al , Blum et al ), baddeleyite (White et al , Moser et al ) and monazite (Fougerouse et al , Seydoux‐Guillaume et al ).…”
Section: Geoscience Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The atom probe provides a unique tool for investigating the nanoscale isotopic composition of minerals. Benchmarking of atom probe analysis of U isotopes in certified U 3 O 8 reference materials has shown that major isotopic ratios agree with known compositional values (Fahey et al ) and there are comparative thermal ion mass spectrometry (TIMS) and atom probe studies that show that Re‐Os analysis by atom probe may yield similar, though less precise, ages to more traditional TIMS analyses (Daly et al ). A number of studies have also investigated the mechanisms that can affect the distribution of radiogenic 207 Pb/ 206 Pb ratios in zircon (Figure ; Valley et al , , Peterman et al , Blum et al ), baddeleyite (White et al , Moser et al ) and monazite (Fougerouse et al , Seydoux‐Guillaume et al ).…”
Section: Geoscience Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the development of laser‐assisted APT, there has been growing interest in applying nanoscale geochemical characterisation to a broad range of geological materials including glass (Gin et al , Hellmann et al , Gin et al ), diamond (Heck et al , Lewis et al , Schirhagl et al , Mukherjee et al ), Fe‐Ni metal alloys (Einsle et al ) and silicides (Gopon et al ), platinum‐group alloys (Parman et al , Daly et al , ), oxides (Bachhav et al , , Fahey et al , Taylor et al , Frierdich et al , Gamal El Dien et al , Genareau et al , Taylor et al ), carbonates (Felmy et al , Branson et al , Pérez‐Huerta et al , Pérez‐Huerta and Laiginhas ), sulfides (Fougerouse et al , Dubosq et al , Fougerouse et al , Gopon et al , Wu et al ), sulfates (Weber et al ), zeolites (Schmidt et al ) and rock‐forming silicates, such as feldspars (White et al , Cao et al ) and olivine (Bloch et al , Cukjati et al , Figure ). However, a high proportion of the published APT work to date has focussed on trace element mobility, particularly Pb, in accessory minerals.…”
Section: Geoscience Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conversely, APM has been employed to test the nanoscale homogeneity of existing geostandards [47]. Others have also reported comparisons between APM chemical and isotopic compositions with those from standard materials or other well-characterised samples [26,28,32]. Initiatives have also been undertaken to develop standard approaches to the application of APM within the geosciences, including the proposed standardisation of data reporting [48].…”
Section: Reference Materials and Standardisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy for interelement and isotopic analyses can frequently exceed ±10% relative error and may not be reproducible between replicate measurements on the same material. 13 , 36 [Percent relative error is here defined as 100% × (measured value – reference value)/reference value.]…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%