“…Although TMA may not be completely representative, it is an efficient way to screen for tissue markers and studies have shown that TMA with 1, 2, and 3 cores will represent about 91%, 96%, and 98%, respectively, compared with whole section studies. [37][38][39][40] Additional full section staining of limited cases showed similar results compared with our microarray results. Compared with our TMA results, the full section results showed no statistical difference in the percentage of positive cases of EAC for IMP3 (TMA, 70%; full section, 77%; Pearson x 2 test, P 5 .86, degrees of freedom of 1) and showed the same mean intensity of expression (mean, 1.27; independent 2-tailed Student t test, P 5 .98) and similar percent of lesional cells with positive staining (TMA mean, 35%; full section mean, 45%; independent 2-tailed Student t test, P 5 .35).…”