1987
DOI: 10.1080/00224545.1987.9713735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unrealistic Pessimism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
66
1
3

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
66
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study addressing the link between perceived risk and behavior among 516 workers from eight different companies, Arezes and Miguel (2008) showed that the higher the perceived risk, the more the workers mentioned wearing hearing protection. In addition, shortly after the nuclear accident at Chernobyl in Ukraine (about a week), Dolinski et al (1987) found that the Polish who perceived themselves as relatively invulnerable to radioactive diseases were less likely to take precautions than those who felt that they were not more exposed than others. Similarly, in a meta-analysis encompassing 43 studies on links between perceived risk and preventive behaviors, Brewer et al (2007) showed that perceptions of risk likelihood, as well as feelings of vulnerability and risk seriousness, were variables that significantly predicted prevention behaviors.…”
Section: Perceived Risk and Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study addressing the link between perceived risk and behavior among 516 workers from eight different companies, Arezes and Miguel (2008) showed that the higher the perceived risk, the more the workers mentioned wearing hearing protection. In addition, shortly after the nuclear accident at Chernobyl in Ukraine (about a week), Dolinski et al (1987) found that the Polish who perceived themselves as relatively invulnerable to radioactive diseases were less likely to take precautions than those who felt that they were not more exposed than others. Similarly, in a meta-analysis encompassing 43 studies on links between perceived risk and preventive behaviors, Brewer et al (2007) showed that perceptions of risk likelihood, as well as feelings of vulnerability and risk seriousness, were variables that significantly predicted prevention behaviors.…”
Section: Perceived Risk and Safetymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the health belief model (Janz & Becker, 1984) and protection motivation theory (Rogers, 1975, 1983), for example, perceived susceptibility (together with other concepts, such as perceived severity, perceived benefits, and perceived barriers) plays a significant role in predicting individuals’ likelihood of taking preventive action. Yet, researchers who theorize a causal relation between perceived risk and behavioral action have found both positive (Dolinski, Gromski, & Zawisza, 1987; Larwood, 1978; Weinstein, 1982, 1983; Weinstein, Sandman, & Roberts, 1990) and negative (Svenson, Fischhoff, & MacGregor, 1985; van der Velde, Hooijkaas, & Pligt, 1991) associations, and still others have reported an absence of significant associations (Joseph et al, 1987; Robertson, 1977; Svenson et al, 1985). Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have shown small, although significant, relationships between risk perception and likelihood of action (Floyd, Prentice-Dunn, & Rogers, 2000; Milne, Sheeran, & Orbell, 2000; Harrison, Mullen, & Green, 1992).…”
Section: The Risk Perception Attitude Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If there were no such distortions, in fact, we would perceive the risks inherent in consciously dangerous activities-such as smoking or driving without a seatbelt-and this would reflect badly on our self image. Interestingly, in some conditions not only does the optimistic bias disappear but it is replaced by pessimistic bias (Dolinsky, Gromsky, and Zawinsza 1986), a tendency that is apparently correlated to the nature of the risk. If, in fact, the optimistic bias characterizes risks that are incidental, potential, and familiar, pessimistic bias corresponds to risks perceived as common, real, and unfamiliar (e.g., the health effects linked to radiation following a nuclear accident).…”
Section: Unrealistic Optimismmentioning
confidence: 99%