Unpacking Income Inequality and Population Health: The Peculiar Absence of Geography

Abstract

Background: A large and growing body of literature investigating the negative relationship between income inequality and population health (at different geographic scales) has developed over the past several years, although the relationship is not universal apparently. We argue that there has been a peculiar absence of geography in studies of the relationship between income inequality and population health and that explanations for the mixed results have been hampered by an inattention to geography.Methods: Using methods of spatial pattern visualization, outlier analysis and comparative case study analysis, we investigate the role of "geography" as a means of "unpacking" the relationship between income inequality and health in Canada and the United States. Results:The findings demonstrate how analyzing the study of income inequality and population health in the context of place makes otherwise obscure patterns visible and opens up new questions and opportunities for investigating how unequal places may be less healthy than more egalitarian ones. Rather than dismissing the importance of income inequality and health because it does not appear to exist at all times and in all places, we raise questions such as: Under what conditions does the relationship between income inequality and population health hold? and What, if anything, is similar about places where it does (or does not) hold? as crucial questions requiring a different kind of analysis than has been common in this literature. Conclusion:We recommend that place and health studies seek this balance between universalistic and particularistic explanations of place and health relationships in order to best understand the socio-geographic production of health.

Geospatial cluster analyses of pneumonia-associated hospitalisations among adults in New York City, 2010–2014

“…We found distinct spatial patterns in the rates of overall pneumonia-associated hospitalisation, severe pneumonia-associated hospitalisation and CAP-associated hospitalisation for NYC during 2010–2014. In applying a spatial framework to investigate the epidemiology of pneumonia, we incorporated the inter-relatedness of race/ethnicity, health behaviours and health services in representing rates of pneumonia-associated hospitalisation [18].…”

Extending the income inequality hypothesis: Ecological results from the 2005 and 2009 Argentine National Risk Factor Surveys

“…This contrasts with null findings from the relatively equal areas/countries of Scandinavia (Bö ckerman et al 2009), Germany (Breckenkamp et al 2007), Denmark (Osler et al 2002(Osler et al , 2003, Canada (Veenstra 2002, Auger et al 2009 and Japan (Shibuya et al 2002). Recently, Dunn et al (2007) have argued that instead of dismissing the income inequality hypothesis, because it does not appear to hold true in all cases under all conditions, research should focus on the particular question of 'under what conditions does the relationship between income inequality and population health hold? '.…”

Income inequality and population health: a political-economic research agenda

“…This research has demonstrated that unequal places have poorer health outcomes than more egalitarian ones for a variety of income inequality measures6; at national and subnational geographic scales7 8; across many different countries9; for a number of age groups 10. These findings are present across a number of health outcomes including all-cause and cause-specific mortality,11 adolescent health,12 mental health13 and cardiovascular health,14 among others.…”