2018
DOI: 10.1080/0376835x.2018.1502076
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universities as city-builders: The city-campus development opportunity in East London–Buffalo City, South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Once they have assimilated into the system, the content of the curriculum promotes capitalism rather than community upliftment and they tend to perceive the indigenous communities in which they were raised as research subjects rather than reservoirs of knowledge (Bunting 2004). Universities should be relevant to the places where they are based and collaborate with local communities even though their mission may be global (Bank and Sibanda 2018).…”
Section: Class Struggle and Social Justicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once they have assimilated into the system, the content of the curriculum promotes capitalism rather than community upliftment and they tend to perceive the indigenous communities in which they were raised as research subjects rather than reservoirs of knowledge (Bunting 2004). Universities should be relevant to the places where they are based and collaborate with local communities even though their mission may be global (Bank and Sibanda 2018).…”
Section: Class Struggle and Social Justicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means the larger the land, the more expensive it is expected to be. Therefore, affordable areas of the city would be preferred to be able to purchase a large area suitable for the scale of the university especially for public and national universities which are known to have limited funds [23], [24]. For optional criteria, MXI was used as an urban index that represents the degree of mixed land uses in an area based on nine different levels: mono housing, mono amenities, mono working, bifunctional (housing + amenities), bifunctional (housing + working), bifunctional (amenities + working), mix 10% amenities + housing + working, mix 20% amenities + housing + working, and mix 30% amenities + housing + working [25].…”
Section: Weighted Overlay Suitability Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to their physical and economic impact on the surroundings, they started to be recognized as a driving force of urban development as well. Since the beginning of the twenty-first century, research has considered university campuses to be as extensive landholders that are capable of changing the urban morphology of their surroundings in a significant way (Larkham 2000;Bank and Sibanda 2018). Moreover, university campuses have also shown to be accompanied by social, cultural, physical, and economic changes happening in their surroundings .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%