2012
DOI: 10.1080/17425964.2012.692994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Understanding the Theoretical Framework of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A collaborative self-study to understand teaching practice and aspects of knowledge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, the analysis of their reflections indicated that they considered design activities as critical contributors to their development of TPACK-in-action. The findings are in line with the current research on DBL, which has also reported increased TPACK competencies of participants (Agyei & Voogt, 2012;Chien et al, 2012;Fransson & Holmberg, 2012;Graham et al, 2012;Hofer & Grandgenett, 2012;Kafyulilo, 2010;Koehler et al, 2007;Koehler & Mishra, 2005b;Kurt, 2012;Rienties et al, 2013;Shin et al, 2009;Timur, 2011). This study further contributes to the current literature by identifying how TPACK-DBL principles could be implemented within a course context and how these principles could contribute to students' understanding of TPACK-inaction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Specifically, the analysis of their reflections indicated that they considered design activities as critical contributors to their development of TPACK-in-action. The findings are in line with the current research on DBL, which has also reported increased TPACK competencies of participants (Agyei & Voogt, 2012;Chien et al, 2012;Fransson & Holmberg, 2012;Graham et al, 2012;Hofer & Grandgenett, 2012;Kafyulilo, 2010;Koehler et al, 2007;Koehler & Mishra, 2005b;Kurt, 2012;Rienties et al, 2013;Shin et al, 2009;Timur, 2011). This study further contributes to the current literature by identifying how TPACK-DBL principles could be implemented within a course context and how these principles could contribute to students' understanding of TPACK-inaction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Moreover, design teams enabled the preservice teachers to no longer become passive users but also designers of technology (Koehler & Mishra, 2005) through a series of design activities from the brainstorming of design ideas offering them opportunities to see varied solutions to technology integration problems, the engagement of theoretical knowledge and then investigation of technological tools and finally to the examination of artefacts. The preservice teachers' perceptions towards the design teams approach are align with previous literature, for example, Lu et al 2011; Fransson and Holmberg (2012) and Johnson (2014) in which the design teams environment created favourable conditions for the development of preservice teachers' TPACK.…”
Section: Research Question 2: What Was the Preservice Teachers' Percesupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Teknoloji bilgisi etkili öğrenmeyi destekler, öğretmen adayları ve öğretmeler için etkili bir öğrenmenin sınıf ortamında sağlanması ve nasıl gerçekleştirileceğinin öğrenilmesi önemlidir (Sweeney ve Drummond, 2013). Fransson ve Holmberg (2012) çalışmalarında öğrencilerin BİT araçları ile kendilerini daha özgür hissettiklerini belirtmiş ve TPİB'nin öğretmen eğitiminde öğrenme, öğretme ve değerlendirme boyutlarında kullanabileceğini ifade etmişlerdir. BİT kullanımını geliştiren kursların öğretmen adaylarının TPİB görüşleri üzerinde olumlu etkisinin olduğu ifade edilmektedir Chai, Koh, Tsai ve Tan 2011;Kabakçı Yurdakul ve Çoklar, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified